Allan’s Newsletter

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

FDA APPROVED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION FOR VACCINES DESPITE MASS CASUALTIES IN FIRST 90 DAYS

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians – it’s long past time for you to speak the truth!

Subject: PROVED MEDICAL FRAUD CAUSES DEATHS OF MILLIONS FROM TOXIC COVID-19 "VACCINES" / SUPPRESSION OF IVERMECTIN / DO NOT INJECT CHILDREN

Covid-19 was NOT a highly dangerous global pandemic. The Covid-19 virus was only dangerous to the very elderly and infirm, as I correctly published on March 21, 2020, based on publicly available data. The world’s top physicians and researchers published the same conclusion six months later in October 2020, in the Great Barrington Declaration.

Highly effective, inexpensive early treatments like Ivermectin were officially suppressed, resulting in millions of needless, preventable Covid-19 deaths.

By far the greatest harm to society from Covid-19 was caused by excessive government-mandated lockdowns, costly and inappropriate treatment protocols and the toxic Covid-19 “vaccines”.

There is ample evidence of fraud and criminal activity in the governments’ illegal over-reactions to the relatively mild Covid-19 flu.

The following important evidence supports criminal prosecutions of those responsible for the fraudulent mismanagement of Covid-19.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

December 9, 2021

The FDA asked a federal court for a ridiculous 55-year timespan to release all of the documentation on the Pfizer COVID shots to the public. Fortunately, that judge refused and has demanded that the FDA start releasing all the info right now.

The first batch of documents have now been released and show that during the first 90 days of the vaccine rollout (December 2020 to February 2021), there were tens of thousands of adverse reactions to the shots recorded and more than 1,200 people were killed. Yet for some reason, the FDA refused to yank the shots out of circulation.

The FDA only recorded serious adverse reactions to the injections of Pfizer’s vaccine, which was created in part using harvested kidney cells from aborted babies. 51,335 people suffered serious general disorders and administration site conditions; 25,957 people suffered nervous system disorders; 17,283 people suffered musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders; 8,476 suffered skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders; 8,848 people suffered respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders; 4,610 suffered from infections and – good grief – parasitic infestations (???); 5,590 people suffered from poisoning, injury and procedural complications; and 1,223 people flat-out died from being injected with the vaccine.

The FDA knew that all this had happened in the first three months of the vaccine rollout, and had compiled all that data on adverse reactions, deaths and parasitic infestations by April of 2021. Just as a reminder, the experimental swine flu vaccine that was rushed to market in 1976 was yanked from the market after it killed just 25 Americans.

With the Pfizer COVID shots, the FDA knew within the first three months that the vaccine had done all this harm.

Not to get sidetracked, but what in the name of all that is holy are the parasites that are in these shots that infected 4,610 people? Parasites? Really, Pfizer?

Anyway, the FDA, which is supposed to keep the public safe from things like E coli outbreaks at the grocery store and dangerous vaccines, continued to renew the Emergency Use Authorization of these experimental shots and has now reached the point where they are about to authorize the injections for newborn babies – probably in January.

This first batch of documents from the FDA is so damning that Congressman Ralph Norman (R-SC) has introduced a bill to force the FDA to release everything publicly within 100 days. It will never pass in the House, because Nancy Pelosi really wants you to get the shot. But at least some people are starting to notice the devastating effects that these experimental shots are having on the population.

Two more professional soccer players collapsed on the field during play in Europe over the past week, by the way. Both suffered heart attacks. One was a 26-year-old woman and the other was a 31-year-old man. A high school football player in Montana died of a heart attack in November. And a young Equestrian rider is now hospitalized long-term with pericarditis and peripheral neuropathy after receiving the Pfizer jab. She has to learn to walk again.

The FDA is rushing to approve the vaccines for babies right now. Before any parent even considers having their child injected with these poisonous death shots, they should read the results of a massive study from Germany that was released just this week. Germany is the largest country in Europe, with a population of 80 million people. That includes about 10 million school-aged children under 18.

The researchers in Germany found that in the last 15 months (the duration of the pandemic), not one single healthy child in Germany has died from coronavirus. Not a single one! Only six children between the ages of 5 and 18 have died from coronavirus in Germany, and those six children all had serious, life-threatening, pre-existing conditions. All other children who contracted COVID shrugged it off, most without even showing major symptoms.

In the UK, researchers have posted similar findings. Only six children out of 12 million in the UK have died of COVID since this Chinese virus started spreading around the world. Yet the FDA is about to tell everyone that children as young as infants can now take these dangerous, experimental shots. The German study showing that COVID poses no risk at all in children – therefore rendering the need for children to be vaccinated moot – can be found HERE.
________________________________________

SMOKING GUN CONFIDENTIAL PFIZER DOCUMENT EXPOSES FDA CRIMINAL COVER-UP OF VACCINE DEATHS… THEY KNEW THE JAB WAS KILLING PEOPLE IN EARLY 2021… THREE TIMES MORE WOMEN THAN MEN
By Mike Adams
December 2, 2021

This article was originally published by Mike Adams on NaturalNews.com. It has been reposted here with permission from the author.

Thanks to the efforts of a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, we now have smoking gun confidential documents that show Pfizer and the FDA knew in early 2021 that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines were killing thousands of people and causing spontaneous abortions while damaging three times more women than men.

One confidential document in particular was part of a court-ordered release of FDA files that the FDA fought by claiming the agency should have 55 years to release this information. A court judge disagreed and ordered the release of 500 documents per month, and the very first batch of documents contained this bombshell entitled, “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”

Get it here:

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Or here, mirrored on NN servers:

https://www.naturalnews.com/files/536-postmarketing-experience.pdf

The document reveals that within just 90 days after the EUA release of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, the company was already aware of voluntary adverse reaction reports that revealed 1,223 deaths and over 42,000 adverse reports describing a total of 158,893 adverse reactions. The reports originated from numerous countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain and other nations.

Aside from “general disorders,” the No. 1 most frequently reported category of mRNA vaccine adverse reactions was Nervous system disorders, clocking in at 25,957 reports.

Pfizer has withheld the total number of doses released across the world, citing corporate trade secrets. This is indicated by “(b) (4)” in the document, where specific numbers and facts are redacted.

Even these numbers — already quite shocking, given the FDA’s insistence that mRNA vaccines are “safe and effective” — barely scratch the surface of the damage and deaths caused by these vaccines. “Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown,” says Pfizer on page 5.

THREE TIMES AS MANY WOMEN DAMAGED, COMPARED TO MEN

Shockingly, the document reveals that more than three times as many women were damaged by the Pfizer vaccine, compared to men. There were 29,914 adverse events recorded in women, with just 9,182 recorded in men. It is not known whether the same number of men and women took the vaccine, but this number exposes the very real possibility of a gender-specific vaccine damage risk that the FDA went to great lengths to cover up.

Anecdotally, most of the neurological damage we’ve seen in people who have been damaged by the vaccine — convulsions, numbness, pain, etc. — has been depicted in women, not men. It looks like the FDA knows the mRNA vaccine exhibits a disproportionate, gender-specific damage profile that also affects women in terms of spontaneous abortions (also covered in the report).

PFIZER TOLD THE FDA ITS MRNA COVID VACCINES CAN CAUSE “ENHANCED DISEASE” BY MAKING COVID WORSE

Also to the shock of many observers who are just now digging into this smoking gun document, Pfizer told the FDA under “Safety concerns” (section 3.1.2) that its mRNA injection could cause, “Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD).”

This means the FDA knew the vaccine could sicken and kill patients who were later infected with covid.

Under the label of “missing information,” Pfizer also told the FDA that it has no information about “Use in Pregnancy and lactation” nor covering “Use in Paediatric Individuals < 12 Years of Age.”

“Vaccine Effectiveness” was also listed as “Missing information” by Pfizer.

In other words, Pfizer told the FDA its vaccines could kill people and that it had no information about vaccine effectiveness, yet the FDA fraudulently pushed the vaccine as “safe and effective” anyway. Pfizer even told the FDA that it had no safety information about use in pregnant women, yet the FDA (and Fauci, the CDC, etc.) all pushed the vaccine for pregnant women, despite the utter lack of safety information.

Based on this document, it appears that the FDA itself has been neck-deep in a criminal conspiracy to hide the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths while granting usage approvals to the very same corporations that openly told the FDA its products were killing people.

Note, too, that the entire corporate media complex has lied from day one, falsely claiming the vaccine has killed no one. They are, of course, complicit in this vaccine holocaust.

SPONTANEOUS ABORTIONS, NEONATAL DEATH AND OTHER EFFECTS ON PREGNANT WOMEN

In the section labeled, “Use in Pregnancy and lactation,” the report discusses reports of the mRNA vaccine being linked to:

spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each).

Notice that “spontaneous abortion” represents by far the highest number in these reports. In other words, the FDA knew this vaccine would kill unborn babies, but they pushed it on pregnant women anyway.

ALL MRNA VACCINES MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED, AND FDA BUREAUCRATS MUST BE INDICTED AND ARRESTED

This confidential document — just the first of thousands yet to be released — reveals two critical things:

1) The FDA committed criminal fraud and misrepresentation in approving mRNA vaccines as “safe and effective.” This means top FDA decision makers must now face arrest and criminal prosecution.

2) The mRNA vaccine was known by Pfizer to be deadly even in its first three months of emergency use. This means Pfizer is also complicit in the continued deaths of innocent victims, as Pfizer itself should have pulled its deadly vaccine and halted all sales and distribution.

_____________________________

RESEARCHER ANDREW HILL’S CONFLICT: A $40 MILLION GATES FOUNDATION GRANT VS A HALF MILLION HUMAN LIVES

by WorldTribune Staff, December 9, 2021

In a stunning admission, virologist Dr. Andrew Hill acknowledged in a zoom call that publication of his study could lead to the deaths of at least a half million people.

In defending his reversal on the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, he discussed his “difficult situation” and said, “I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance.”

The incident is recounted in Robert Kennedy Jr’s New York Times Bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.

Andrew Hill, PhD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use.

Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.

On Jan. 6 of 2021, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.

Shortly before he published, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, and one of the world’s leading medical research analysts, contacted Hill via Zoom and recorded the call (transcript below). Lawrie had learned of his new position and reached out to try to rectify the situation.

In a remarkable exchange, Hill admitted his manipulated study would likely delay the uptake of ivermectin in the UK and United States, but said he hoped his doing so would only set the lifesaving drug’s acceptance back by about “six weeks,” after which he was willing to give his support for its use.

Hill affirmed that the rate of death at that time was 15,000 people per day. At the 80 percent recovery rate using the drug, which Hill and Lawrie discussed earlier in the call, the number of preventable deaths incurred by such a delay would be staggering — as many as 504,000.

Lawrie was unable to persuade Hill, who instead of joining her team as lead author, went ahead and published his manipulated findings.

Four days before publication, Hill’s sponsor Unitaid gave the University of Liverpool, Hill’s employer $40 million. Unitaid, it turns out, was also an author of the conclusions of Hill’s study.

In the call, Lawrie berated Hill’s study as “flawed,” “rushed,“ “not properly put together,” and “bad research . . . bad research,” which Hill appears not to have denied.

Instead, when pressed he admitted his sponsor, Unitaid, was an unacknowledged author of conclusions.

“Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah,” he told Lawrie.

Kennedy explained: “Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries . . . to lobby governments to finance the purchase of medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals” for distribution in Africa.

He reports:

“Dr. Lawrie knew that to make its ivermectin determination, WHO would rely on Hill’s study and another study from McMaster University known as the “Together Trial.” McMaster was hopelessly and irredeemably conflicted. NIH gave McMaster $1,081,541 in 2020 and 2021.61 A separate group of McMaster University scientists was, at that time, engaged in developing their own COVID vaccine—an effort that would never pay dividends if WHO recommended ivermectin as Standard of Care. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was funding the massive “Together Trial” testing ivermectin, HCQ, and other potential drugs against COVID, in Brazil and other locations. Critics accused Gates and the McMaster researchers of designing that study to make ivermectin fail.”

In other words, the McMaster researchers, just like Andrew Hill, knew that a positive appraisal of ivermectin would cost their university millions of dollars.

In a terse exchange, Lawrie laid out the ethical and personal risks for Hill:

Lawrie: I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.

Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.

Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground …You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable.

Much like “two weeks to flatten the curve,” in the intervening year Hill appears to have gone all-in on a deception originally envisioned to last only six weeks.

Kennedy reports that on Oct. 1, 2021, “Hill resurfaced on Twitter touting his upcoming lecture, ironically titled, ‘Effects of Bias and Potential Medical Fraud in the Promotion of Ivermectin.’”

Dr. Pierre Kory, of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, commented, “Andrew is apparently making a living now accusing the doctors and scientists who support ivermectin of medical fraud.”

Regulatory acceptance of ivermectin did not delay only six weeks. Instead, almost a year later, it has still not been approved by health agencies in the United Kingdom or in United States. Instead The WHO, CDC, NIH, and FDA have suppressed the drug’s use.

Kory added, “Hill and his backers are some of the worst people in human history. They are responsible for the deaths of millions.”

[For further analysis, see Neville Hodgkinson’s article at the Defender, and Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s New York Times bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.]

Here is the transcript of the conversation between Lawrie and Hill:

Lawrie: Lots of people are in sensitive positions; they’re in hospital, in ICUs dying, and they need this medicine.

Hill: Well …

Lawrie: This is what I don’t get, you know, because you’re not a clinician. You’re not seeing people dying every day. And this medicine prevents deaths by 80 percent. So 80 percent of those people who are dying today don’t need to die because there’s ivermectin.

Hill: There are a lot, as I said, there are a lot of different opinions about this. As I say, some people simply …

Lawrie: We are looking at the data; it doesn’t matter what other people say. We are the ones who are tasked with looking at the data and reassuring everybody that this cheap and effective treatment will save lives. It’s clear. You don’t have to say, well, so-and-so says this, and so-and-so says that. It’s absolutely crystal clear. We can save lives today. If we can get the government to buy ivermectin.

Hill: Well, I don’t think it’s as simple as that, because you’ve got trials …

Lawrie: It is as simple as that. We don’t have to wait for studies … we have enough evidence now that shows that ivermectin saves lives, it prevents hospitalization. It saves the clinical staff going to work every day and being exposed. And frankly, I’m shocked at how you are not taking responsibility for that decision.

And you still haven’t told me who is [influencing you]? Who is giving you that opinion? Because you keep saying you’re in a sensitive position. I appreciate you are in a sensitive position, if you’re being paid for something and you’re being told [to support] a certain narrative … that is a sensitive position.

So, then you kind of have to decide, well, do I take this payment? Because in actual fact, [you] can see [your false] conclusions are going to harm people. So maybe you need to say, I’m not going to be paid for this.

I can see the evidence, and I will join the Cochrane team as a volunteer, like everybody on the Cochrane team is a volunteer. Nobody’s being paid for this work.

Hill: I think fundamentally, we’re reaching the [same] conclusion about the survival benefit. We’re both finding a significant effect on survival.

Lawrie: No, I’m grading my evidence. I’m saying I’m sure of this evidence. I’m saying I’m absolutely sure it prevents deaths. There is nothing as effective as this treatment. What is your reluctance? Whose conclusion is that?

Hill complains again that outsiders are influencing him.

Lawrie: You keep referring to other people. It’s like you don’t trust yourself. If you were to trust yourself, you would know that you have made an error and you need to correct it because you know, in your heart, that this treatment prevents death.

Hill: Well, I know, I know for a fact that the data right now is not going to get the drug approved.

Lawrie: But, Andy — know this will come out. It will come out that there were all these barriers to the truth being told to the public and to the evidence being presented. So please, this is your opportunity just to acknowledge [the truth] in your review, change your conclusions, and come on board with this Cochrane Review, which will be definitive. It will be the review that shows the evidence and gives the proof. This was the consensus on Wednesday night’s meeting with 20 experts.

Hill protests that the U.S. National Institutes of Health will not agree to recommend ivermectin.

Lawrie: Yeah, because the NIH is owned by the vaccine lobby.

Hill: That’s not something I know about.

Lawrie: Well, all I’m saying is this smacks of corruption and you are being played.

Hill: I don’t think so.

Lawrie: Well then, you have no excuse because your work in that review is flawed. It’s rushed. It is not properly put together.

Lawrie points out that Hill’s study ignores a host of clinical outcomes that affect patients. She scolds Hill for ignoring the beneficial effects of ivermectin as prophylaxis, its effect on speed to testing negative for the virus, on the need for mechanical ventilation, on reduced admissions to intensive care, and other outcomes that are clinically meaningful.

This is bad research … bad research. So, at this point, I don’t know … you seem like a nice guy, but I am really, really worried about you.

Hill: Okay. Yeah. I mean, it’s, it’s a difficult situation.

Lawrie: No, you might be in a difficult situation. I’m not, because I have no paymaster. I can tell the truth. How can you deliberately try and mess it up … you know?

Hill: It’s not messing it up. It’s saying that we need, we need a short time to look at some more studies.

Lawrie: So, how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily – up to you? What is, what is the timeline that you’ve allowed for this, then?

Hill: Well, I think . . . I think that it goes to WHO [World Health Organization]and the NIH [National Institutes of Health]and the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] and the EMA [European Medicines Agency]. And they’ve got to decide when they think enough’s enough.

Lawrie: How do they decide? Because there’s nobody giving them good evidence synthesis, because yours is certainly not good.

Hill: Well, when yours comes out, which will be in the very near future … at the same time, there’ll be other trials producing results, which will nail it with a bit of luck. And we’ll be there.

Lawrie: It’s already nailed.

Hill: No, that’s, that’s not the view of the WHO and the FDA.

Lawrie: You’d rather risk loads of people’s lives. Do you know if you and I stood together on this, we could present a united front and we could get this thing. We could make it happen. We could save lives; we could prevent [British National Health Service doctors and nurses] people from getting infected. We could prevent the elderly from dying.

These are studies conducted around the world in several different countries. And they’re all saying the same thing. Plus there’s all sorts of other evidence to show that it works. Randomized controlled trials do not need to be the be-all and end-all. But [even] based on the randomized controlled trials, it is clear that ivermectin works. It prevents deaths and it prevents harms and it improves outcomes for people …

I can see we’re getting nowhere because you have an agenda, whether you like it or not, whether you admit to it or not, you have an agenda. And the agenda is to kick this down the road as far as you can. So … we are trying to save lives. That’s what we do.

I’m a doctor and I’m going to save as many lives as I can. And I’m going to do that through getting the message [out] on ivermectin. Okay. Unfortunately, your work is going to impair that, and you seem to be able to bear the burden of many, many deaths, which I cannot do.

Lawrie then asks again: Would you tell me? I would like to know who pays you as a consultant through WHO?

Hill: It’s Unitaid.

Lawrie: All right. So who helped to … Whose conclusions are those on the review that you’ve done? Who is not listed as an author? Who’s actually contributed?

Hill: Well, I mean, I don’t really want to get into, I mean, it … Unitaid …

Lawrie: I think that . . . it needs to be clear. I would like to know who, who are these other voices that are in your paper that are not acknowledged? Does Unitaid have a say? Do they influence what you write?

Hill: Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah.

Lawrie: Okay. So, who is it in Unitaid, then? Who is giving you opinions on your evidence?

Hill: Well, it’s just the people there. I don’t …

Lawrie: So they have a say in your conclusions.

Hill: Yeah.

Lawrie: Could you please give me a name of someone in Unitaid I could speak to, so that I can share my evidence and hope to try and persuade them to understand it?

Hill: Oh, I’ll have a think about who to, to offer you with a name … but I mean, this is very difficult because I’m, you know, I’ve, I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance …

Lawrie: Who are these people? Who are these people saying this?

Hill: Yeah … it’s a very strong lobby …

Lawrie: Okay. Look, I think I can see kind of a dead end, because you seem to have a whole lot of excuses, but, um, you know, that to, to justify bad research practice. So I’m really, really sorry about this, Andy.

I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.

Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.

Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground … You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable.

And I can’t understand why you don’t see that, because the evidence is there and you are not just denying it, but your work’s actually actively obfuscating the truth. And this will come out. So I’m really sorry … As I say, you seem like a nice guy, but I think you’ve just kind of been misled somehow.

Hill promises he will do everything in his power to get ivermectin approved if she will give him six weeks.

Hill: Well, what I hope is that this, this stalemate that we’re in doesn’t last very long. It lasts a matter of weeks. And I guarantee I will push for this to last for as short amount of time as possible.

Lawrie: So, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for? How long do you think you will be paid to [make] the stalemate go on?

Hill: From my side. Okay … I think end of February, we will be there, six weeks.’

Lawrie: How many people die every day?

Hill: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, 15,000 people a day.

Lawrie: Fifteen thousand people a day times six weeks … because at this rate, all other countries are getting ivermectin except the UK and the USA, because the UK and the USA and Europe are owned by the vaccine lobby.

Hill: My goal is to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to get it approved so that it reaches the maximum …

Lawrie: You’re not doing everything you can, because everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you, “I can see this prevents deaths. So I’m not going to support this conclusion any more, and I’m going to tell the truth.”

Hill: What, I’ve got to do my responsibilities to get as much support as I can to get this drug approved as quickly as possible.

Lawrie: Well, you’re not going to get it approved the way you’ve written that conclusion. You’ve actually shot yourself in the foot, and you’ve shot us all in the foot. All of … everybody trying to do something good. You have actually completely destroyed it.

Hill: Okay. Well, that’s where we’ll, I guess we’ll have to agree to differ.

Lawrie: Yeah. Well, I don’t know how you sleep at night, honestly.

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: December-09-21 3:16 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: FORMER WHO RESEARCHER DR ASTRID STUCKELBERGER: ‘A PANDEMIC OF LIES’

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

BOMBSHELL BOOK: THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI, BY ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. – DOCTORS FOR COVID ETHICS

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians – it’s long past time for you to speak the truth!

Subject: FORMER WHO RESEARCHER DR ASTRID STUCKELBERGER: ‘A PANDEMIC OF LIES’

I have personally verified in my extensive research most of the key technical points that former WHO researcher Dr Astrid Stuckelberger states in her interview herein.

Highly effective, inexpensive early treatments were officially suppressed, resulting in needless, preventable Covid-19 deaths.

By far the greatest harm to society from Covid-19 was caused by excessive government-mandated lockdowns, costly and inappropriate treatment protocols and the highly toxic Covid-19 “vaccines”.

While it is possible that some early errors were made through innocent incompetence, it is not credible that rational individuals and groups could continue to be innocently dysfunctional for this long.

There is ample evidence of fraud and criminal activity in all aspects of the governments’ illegal over-reactions to the relatively mild Covid-19 flu.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

by brianpeckford

By Dr. Nicole Delépine Global Research, December 05, 2021 Nouveau Monde
So clearly there seems to be three situations:

· The appearance of a cancer rapidly after the injection (two weeks to a few months) and very progressive, in a person who was previously free of known carcinological pathologies.

· The resumption of cancer in a patient who has been in complete remission for several months or years.

· The rapid, even explosive, evolution of a cancer that is not yet controlled.

by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 2021

Like many around the world, at Doctors for Covid Ethics we have been working to raise awareness that the global response to COVID-19 has not been based on evidence, medicine or science. It is a dangerous political and economic intervention, conducted in medical disguise, to serve a wealthy ruling elite at the expense of human health, human liberty, and human life itself.
In his new book, ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. blows the scientific cover on this medical deception wide open, by shining a light – indeed a bank of floodlights – on the real actors, agendas, billion-dollar conflicts of interest and state-corporate crime behind the so-called pandemic response.

HOW CHINA CONTROLS YOUR COVID LIFE
Analysis By Dr. Joseph Mercola December 09, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

The kind of society the technocratic elites are pushing us all toward is one that emulates China’s authoritarian rule, where total submission to government is the only option if you want to live
There’s evidence suggesting the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is behind the unscientific denial of the SARS-CoV-2 lab leak theory by mainstream U.S. media
Most U.S. mainstream media have financial ties to the CCP. Scientists working on dangerous gain-of-function experiments also have incentive to protect China from being accused of a lab leak, as they don’t want gain-of-function research to be banned
China also has powerful influence over American businesses, which realize that if the CCP is displeased, it can destroy billion-dollar companies and erase the fortunes of thousands of employees and millions of shareholders
The U.S. is becoming more totalitarian by the day, and many of the incoming changes to society are patterned after the CCP’s iron rule, with round-the-clock digital surveillance, a punishing social credit score and a draconian censorship system that hunts down even the smallest dissenter

FORMER WHO EMPLOYEE DR ASTRID STUCKELBERGER: ‘A PANDEMIC OF LIES’

December 8, 2021 / Brianpeckford

“I am not an alarmist, I just want to explain with science, the lies, the corruption, the propaganda… And about the harm from the vaccines. Because I’m an expert in public health and science.”
Astrid Stuckelberger has 30 years of experience as a researcher. In the years 2009-13, she was affiliated with the WHO, with pandemics as her specialty. She has published 180 publications and 12 books.

Published: December 5, 2021, 11:10 am

In an interview with a Norwegian outlet, Stuckelberger said she is most worried because the jabs are not vaccines, “but a biotechnological, synthetic experiment”.

Because it contains genetic modifications, such as GMOs, people should have been informed about the contents of the vaccine. “The dangerous thing about the vaccine is that it triggers infection. I do not think it is the spike protein that is the problem, but that the vaccine contains graphene. It’s deadly, and now we have statistics. We know.”

BILL GATES TOOK OVER THE WHO

Stuckelberger also underscored that the “WHO is not the same organization as before”. There was a change in 2016, she explained.

“It was special: Organizations such as GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization led by Bill Gates – they came to WHO in 2006 with funding. Since then, the WHO has developed into a new type of international organization. GAVI gained more and more influence, and total immunity, more than the diplomats in the UN. GAVI can do exactly what they want, the police can do nothing.”

The WHO underwent an audit in 2014 and after that, it became more like a company with countries as its subsidiaries.

“When I worked with international relations in the WHO in 2013, I saw that GAVI came in more and more. GAVI presented a global action plan for vaccination 2012-2020. That is, eight years where GAVI had everything in their hands. Bill Gates handled the vaccination, he took over.”

The WHO wields enormous power over countries, she said. “Before, all countries were free. But now, when I do interviews around the world, I see that each country is part of a ‘WHO company’. WHO is no longer a democratic member organization, like the UN. The various governments form the basis of the ‘enterprise’. It logically agrees with what is happening now, since the ‘companies’ want money, business, and to control people. It’s like slavery. The taxes we pay, they go to governments that are subject to ‘the company’. Under the multinational organizations, such as GAVI.”

CONTRACT BETWEEN GAVI, THE WORLD BANK AND THE WHO

“GAVI, the World Bank and the WHO entered into a contract called IFFM: International Facility Finance for Immunization. Our countries, our people, pay to the WHO, the World Bank and GAVI to carry out their immunization programs. Which means vaccinating the entire population. When you see the plan from GAVI, you see that from 2012 to 2020 they have had this as a goal. But then it did not work, they had to create a pandemic.”

She said the pandemic was most certainly planned. ” You can see this from all the documents. Everyone can analyze them, they are in the open, right in front of our eyes.”

She pointed to research by Professor John Ioannidis at Stanford University showing that mortality in 2020 was not higher compared to other years. “It’s a lie, and no pandemic. The WHO accepts that mortality is not higher, yet they have not declared the ‘pandemic’ to be over,” she added.

Stuckelberger said she did not view herself as a whistleblower, but an expert in public health, medicine and science. But Gates’ minions have declared war on her. “The universities of Geneva and Lausanne have stopped all my courses. I’m on trial, they’re attacking me. They want to revoke my medical license, they’re trying to say I’m not competent, that I’m lying. This applies to all researchers who say this, we are now several doctors who warn of death after vaccination. It is dangerous for professionals to talk about it.”

The former WHO employee laughed wryly about the role of the media in spreading lies. “Media is paid for by the multinational ‘companies’. I call them international pirates. And the media controls the governments. The media must become independent, they must help the population to obtain free information.”

A number of studies and doctors have highlighted that there is treatment for Covid-19.

PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TRICKED! STOP THE JABS IMMEDIATELY!

She believes that vaccination must be stopped immediately. “On the grounds of the content of the vaccines. After 30 years of research, I know that when you have one, two or three case studies and you observe under a microscope, for conceptual evidence, then you do not need to do more research. What you see under a microscope is proof enough. When up to ten experts around the world see the same thing under the microscope, that’s enough.

“In the vaccines they see graphene, parasites, metals… Therefore we should stop the vaccination, and ban all injections. Those who continue should be prosecuted.”

According to Stuckelberger, the death rates and side effects that are reported make up only 1-10 percent of the reality. At the end of October, European EudraVigilance showed 29 000 dead, but with estimated dark numbers it could be 290 000.

“This is not easy to know, because autopsies are not performed. There are a lot of lies and scams in science, and in the systems. The PCR test is one example, the doctor cannot use it diagnostically. Doctors are paid to claim that deaths are due to Covid, based on PCR that does not work. Very often this happens without an autopsy. They say the death is due to Covid, even when it is not.”

Doctors are paid to claim that deaths are due to Covid, based on PCR that does not work.

“It is terrible that one does not do clinical research, one only obtains information from the hospitals. It is unique in pandemic history that the data is not available. In the United States, 17 000 deaths from vaccinations are reported, including children and babies. It is not ethical to continue. So far in the United States, the death toll is three times higher than the total of all vaccines in the last 35 years. These are official figures, without clinical research or validation. The research is not finished, but the vaccination continues. It’s awful, really criminal.”

Stuckelberger confirmed that eight doses were being rolled out. “But there was no pandemic. It was a pandemic of PCR, propaganda, fear propaganda… There is massive corruption and conflicts of interest. Science and the media are also corrupt, the whole system is corrupt. Professionals are bought with ownership interests in vaccine companies. They’ve been thinking about it for the last 20 years. The industry controls the media, the doctors… The lies come from universities that say ‘we know science’. It’s unique. The universities of Switzerland sell Pfizer and Moderna.

“People have been tricked. They have not seen that it was propaganda. And that policies and definitions have changed.”

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: December-08-21 9:17 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: THE OMICRON VARIANT PROVIDES A SAFER, MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO COVID-19

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

NORWEGIAN COVID EXPERTS SAYS OMICRON COULD PROVIDE “BEST SCENARIO” OF “NATURAL IMMUNITY”

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians – it’s long past time for you to wake up!

SUBJECT: THE OMICRON VARIANT PROVIDES A SAFER, MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO COVID-19

I published since March 21, 2020, almost two years ago, that the Covid-19 lockdowns were harmful and ineffective, and that has now proved correct.

I published since January 2021, almost one year ago, that the Covid-19 vaccines were dangerous and ineffective, and that has also proved correct.

Both the above realities have now been confirmed by world-class experts.

You must stop the toxic Covid-19 injections now. Estimates of total deaths in the first year caused by these toxic injections range up to 1 in 60 people injected.

Everything you have done to try to control the Covid-19 illness has made things much worse – the lockdowns and “vaccines” encouraged the evolution of variants and caused needless suffering and death.

I cannot believe that the media were innocently duped in this matter – the corruption of governments and health authorities seems to also extend to the mainstream media.

It is simply not credible that so many people could be this remarkably gullible – this utterly wrong – for this long – there is ample evidence of criminal activity.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.
Calgary

THE OMICRON VARIANT PROVIDES A SAFER, MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO COVID-19

I agree with the technical conclusions made by the Dr Mark Trozzi team in today’s publication, below. My own research and discussions with medical experts previously reached similar conclusions.

On December 6, 2021 I had a worthwhile conversation with one of my eminent physician friends, Dr L. He has a stellar career, and his credentials include:

· Honours Microbiology/Virology

· Honours Biochemistry

· MD Degree

· Specialty Medical Degree

· Winner of the two Top Global Awards in his Specialty

His suggestion is that the Omicron variant is highly contagious but very mild, and this is the normal course of viral evolution and provides a significant opportunity:
Instead of fighting Omicron with the usual unsuccessful-to-date lockdowns and toxic “vaccines”, let Omicron spread, treat the mild symptoms and everyone will soon have natural immunity.

The next day, December 7, 2021, COVID experts in Norway stated that since the Omicron variant is highly transmissible but “milder”, it could prove to be the “best scenario” because it would boost “natural immunity” and bring the end of the pandemic closer.

Variant is likely to be “both very mild and very transmissible.”

7 December, 2021

Paul Joseph Watson

COVID experts in Norway say that Omicron variant being highly transmissible but “milder” could prove to be the “best scenario” because it would boost “natural immunity” and bring the end of the pandemic closer.

The country’s state epidemiologist Frode Forland was responding to news of the biggest Omicron outbreak outside of South Africa, which occurred at an Oslo Christmas party.

“As many as 120 people who attended the Louise Restaurant and Bar on the night of November 26th have now tested positive for coronavirus, about half of whom have screened positive for omicron, with 13 of those proven to have the variant in sequencing,” reports the Telegraph.

Oslo infectious disease doctor Tine Ravlo revealed, “They have symptoms like fever, cough, headache, muscle pain, fatigue, but for now, none of them has become severely ill, and none of them have been treated in hospital.”

This is positive news according to Forland because it clearly indicates the variant “would be both very mild and very transmissible.”

“That is the hope. That is the best scenario we can have,” he said. “That it’s getting minder, most people will get it, and they will get a natural immunity.”

“It might be that it has now replicated and mutated so many times that this is the optimal position from the virus’ point of view, to spread widely and not kill the hosts,” added Forland.

“That’s what we’ve seen with other diseases beforehand. And of course, then it gets into more like an endemic phase,” he concluded.

The position of experts in Norway is mirrored by the CEO of South Africa’s largest private healthcare network, who asserted that the Omicron variant is “so mild” that it “may signal the end of COVID-19.”

THE OMICRON VARIANT

drtrozzi.org December 8, 2021

There are three main sources of variants that we must consider.

The first source of variants occurs in a healthy normal population without any of the lock-downs, and forced injections. These populations develop herd immunity, the virus becomes more infectious but less noxious, meaning that it spreads through the populations cause ever decreasing disease, the population becomes immune, and the virus joins millions of others living peacefully within our biome.

The second source of variants occurs when you impose mass use of a “leaky” vaccines on populations. This is exactly what has been done in most of the world. The forced covid 19 injections are complex and harmful in many ways. One way is that they trigger production of very selective antibodies against only the spike protein of the coronavirus. These ineffective antibodies do not stop disease or transmission, rather they exert an evolutionary pressure on the coronaviruses harbored within the injection victims to modify their spike protein so as to circumvent the counter-spike-protein antibodies. This is likely what the omicron variant is. It is a SARS C0V2 variant with 32 genetic mutations or changes to its spike protein. It is likely the result of coronavirus evolution within heavily covid injected populations.
[My Note: My eminent specialist physician friend Dr D and I reached this correct conclusion back in early 2021 when the Covid-19 “vaccines” were first being introduced – that these “leaky vaccines” would encourage the forced-evolution of “vaccine-resistant” variants, which is exactly what happened. I also predicted at his time that the “vaccines” would be toxic and net-harmful, not beneficial, which has also proved correct.]

Omicron likely did not originate in Africa, rather it was first detected in Sweden and Israel. Africa is the least covid injected continent with estimates that only 6% of the population have been coerced or forced into the injections. It is thus no surprise to honest experts in this field, that Africa has by far less disease and death due to covid that the rest of the world.

Source 1 & 2

On November 12, 2021 Dr Geert Vanden Bosche PhD addressed the multinational general assembly of the World Council For Health. On November 17, 2021 he addressed global covid experts at the African Health Summit.

Dr Vanden Bossche beseeched the continent of Africa to refuse the covid injections so that humanity might have a large population with intact immune systems that could develop and maintain natural herd immunity, ensuring the survival of mankind. He feels that heavily injected countries and continents are already in deep jeopardy.

On November 26th the WHO declared Omicron or “variant B.1.1.529” to be a variant of concern. Claims were made that it originated in Africa. Increased pressure to inject the African people was launched. Simultaneously the destructive lock-downs and human rights violations against deceived and frightened populations were ramped back up by covid-agent-occupied and misled governments around the world.

The Third Source of Variants is laboratories. The original SARS C0V2 virus was the product of “gain of function” research carried out largely at the cost of the citizens and tax payers who were also to be its victims: all of us. https://rumble.com/vq6emy-prosecuting-those-behind-covid-mass-murder-david-martin-phd-explains.html

The criminals and enemies of mankind who have orchestrated the creation of artificial viruses to hurt and manipulate us are still at large. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and their many accomplices sadly have not yet been arrested or stopped by whatever reasonable means necessarily. So we must always remember that these predators have stolen and spent billions of dollars on biologic weapons development. As long as they remain free and at large, we run the risk of them releasing all sorts of variants and other biologic weapons.

My primary impression is that the forced covid-19 “vaccine” injections are working as planned, in concert with the SARS CoV2 virus which the covid criminals released in late 2019. The intended purposes of the injections’ appear to be to create death, disease, and to provide an infected and immunologic-damaged population within whom increasing dangerous coronaviruses will evolve, while blocking the natural herd immunity which is the simple natural way out of this massive covid prison camp. They don’t need to release more dangerous viruses; through forced injections they can stimulate their evolution within the victims.

The best steps that we can take right now are first, stop all the covid injections everywhere; second, arrest or eliminate the network of criminals and enemies of the people running this operation, and secure the viral gain of function laboratories; third, make safe effective early treatments and prevention available to whomever may need them, while returning to traditional infectious disease practices of quarantining only the sick, and supporting voluntary extra precautions for vulnerable persons; fourth, end all the human rights violations and nonsensical mandates, such as face muzzles, lockdowns, anti-social distancing etc; and fifth educate and encourage the public regarding practices to optimize the health of our immune systems.

Recommended Readings

I highly recommend reading:
this excellent article from Dr Rob Verkerk PhD of the Alliance for Natural Health International: https://www.anhinternational.org/news/is-omicron-as-ominous-as-they-say/
this article by Dr Geert Vanden Bossche: https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/mass-vaccination-will-push-sars-cov-2-spike-protein-beyond-omicron
and Dr Paul Alexander’s article: https://drtrozzi.org/2021/12/08/more-than-400-studies-on-the-failure-of-compulsory-covid-interventions/

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: December-04-21 3:00 PM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: MORE THAN 400 STUDIES ON THE FAILURE OF COMPULSORY COVID INTERVENTIONS

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

MORE THAN 400 STUDIES ON THE FAILURE OF COMPULSORY COVID INTERVENTIONS

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians – it’s long past time for you to wake up!

MORE THAN 400 STUDIES ON THE FAILURE OF COMPULSORY COVID INTERVENTIONS

I published since March 21, 2020, almost two years, that the Covid-19 lockdowns were harmful and ineffective, and that has now proved correct.

I published since January 2021, almost one year, that the Covid-19 vaccines were dangerous and ineffective, and that has also proved correct.

Everything you have done to try to control the Covid-19 illness has made things much worse – the lockdowns and “vaccines” caused needless suffering and death.

I cannot believe that the media were innocently duped in this matter – the corruption of governments and health authorities seems to also extend to the mainstream media.

It is simply not credible that so many people could be this remarkably gullible – this utterly wrong – for this long – there is ample evidence of criminal activity.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.
Calgary

By Paul Elias Alexander November 30, 2021

Dr Alexander is a world-class expert in epidemiology and evidence-based medicine.

The great body of evidence (comparative research studies and high-quality pieces of evidence and reporting judged to be relevant to this analysis) shows that COVID-19 lockdowns, shelter-in-place policies, masks, school closures, and mask mandates have failed in their purpose of curbing transmission or reducing deaths. These restrictive policies were ineffective and devastating failures, causing immense harm especially to the poorer and vulnerable within societies.

Nearly all governments have attempted compulsory measures to control the virus, but no government can claim success. The research indicates that mask mandates, lockdowns, and school closures have had no discernible impact of virus trajectories.

Bendavid reported “in the framework of this analysis, there is no evidence that more restrictive nonpharmaceutical interventions (‘lockdowns’) contributed substantially to bending the curve of new cases in England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, or the United States in early 2020.” We’ve known this for a very long time now but governments continue to double down, causing misery upon people with ramifications that will likely take decades or more to repair.

The benefits of the societal lockdowns and restrictions have been totally exaggerated and the harms to our societies and children have been severe: the harms to children, the undiagnosed illness that will result in excess mortality in years to come, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation in our young people, drug overdoses and suicides due to the lockdown policies, the crushing isolation due to the lockdowns, psychological harms, domestic and child abuse, sexual abuse of children, loss of jobs and businesses and the devastating impact, and the massive numbers of deaths resulting from the lockdowns that will impact heavily on women and minorities.

Now we have whispers again for the new lockdowns in response to the Omicron variant that, by my estimations, will be likely infectious but not more lethal.

How did we get here? We knew that we could never eradicate this mutable virus (that has an animal reservoir) with lockdowns and that it would likely become endemic like other circulating common cold coronaviruses. When we knew an age-risk stratified approach was optimal (focused protection as outlined in the Great Barrington Declaration) and not carte blanche policies when we had evidence of a 1,000-fold differential in risk of death between a child and an elderly person. We knew of the potency and success of early ambulatory outpatient treatment in reducing the risk of hospitalization and death in the vulnerable.

It was clear very early on that Task Forces and medical advisors and decision-makers were not reading the evidence, were not up to speed with the science or data, did not understand the evidence, did not ‘get’ the evidence, and were blinded to the science, often driven by their own prejudices, biases, arrogance, and ego. They remain ensconced in sheer academic sloppiness and laziness. It was clear that the response was not a public health one. It was a political one from day one and continues today.

A recent study (pre-print) captures the essence and catastrophe of a lockdown society and the hollowing out of our children by looking at how children learn (3 months to 3 years old) and finding across all measures that “children born during the pandemic have significantly reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance compared to children born pre-pandemic.” Researchers also reported that “males and children in lower socioeconomic families have been most affected. Results highlight that even in the absence of direct SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 illness, the environmental changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic is significantly and negatively affecting infant and child development.”

Perhaps Donald Luskin of the Wall Street Journal best captures what we have stably witnessed since the start of these unscientific lockdowns and school closures: “Six months into the Covid-19 pandemic, the U.S. has now carried out two large-scale experiments in public health—first, in March and April, the lockdown of the economy to arrest the spread of the virus, and second, since mid-April, the reopening of the economy. The results are in. Counterintuitive though it may be, statistical analysis shows that locking down the economy didn’t contain the disease’s spread and reopening it didn’t unleash a second wave of infections.”

The British Columbia Center for Disease Control (BCCDC) issued a full report in September 2020 on the impact of school closures on children and found para “that i) children comprise a small proportion of diagnosed COVID-19 cases, have less severe illness, and mortality is rare ii) children do not appear to be a major source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in households or schools, a finding which has been consistent globally iii) there are important differences between how influenza and SARS-CoV-2 are transmitted. School closures may be less effective as a prevention measure for COVID-19 iv) school closures can have severe and unintended consequences for children and youth v) school closures contribute to greater family stress, especially for female caregivers, while families balance child care and home learning with employment demands vi) family violence may be on the rise during the COVID pandemic, while the closure of schools and childcare centres may create a gap in the safety net for children who are at risk of abuse and neglect.”

Now places like Austria (November 2021) have re-entered the world of lockdown lunacy only to be outmatched by Australia. Indeed, an illustration of the spurious need for these ill-informed actions is that they are being done in the face of clear scientific evidence showing that during strict prior societal lockdowns, school lockdowns, mask mandates, and additional societal restrictions, the number of positive cases went up!

The pandemic response today remains a purely political one.

What follows is the current totality of the body of evidence (available comparative studies and high-level pieces of evidence, reporting, and discussion) on COVID-19 lockdowns, masks, school closures, and mask mandates. There is no conclusive evidence supporting claims that any of these restrictive measures worked to reduce viral transmission or deaths. Lockdowns were ineffective, school closures were ineffective, mask mandates were ineffective, and masks themselves were and are ineffective and harmful.

Table 1: Evidence showing that COVID-19 lockdowns, use of face masks, school closures, and mask mandates were largely ineffective and caused crushing harms

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: December-03-21 12:12 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: PHYSICIANS DECLARATION II – GLOBAL COVID SUMMIT – STOP THE COVID-19 INJECTIONS FOR CHILDREN AND IMMUNE

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians – it’s long past time for you to wake up!

PHYSICIANS DECLARATION II – GLOBAL COVID SUMMIT – STOP THE COVID-19 INJECTIONS FOR CHILDREN AND THE IMMUNE

I have been telling you since January 2021, almost one year, that the Covid-19 vaccines were dangerous and ineffective. Here is a highly credible opinion from top experts.

You must stop the toxic Covid-19 injections now. Estimates of total deaths in the first year caused by these injections range up to 1 in 60 people injected.

Everything you have done to try to control the Covid-19 illness has made things much worse – the lockdowns and “vaccines” caused needless suffering and death.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.
Calgary

GlobalCovidSummit.org
October 29, 2021
Physicians Declaration II – Updated
Global Covid Summit

WE, THE PHYSICIANS OF THE WORLD, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the imminent threat to humanity brought forth by current Covid-19 policies, are compelled to declare the following:

WHEREAS, after 20 months of research, millions of patients treated, hundreds of clinical trials performed and scientific data shared, we have demonstrated and documented our success and understanding in combating COVID-19;

WHEREAS, in considering the risks vs. benefits of major policy decisions, thousands of physicians and medical scientists worldwide have reached consensus on three foundational principles;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:

RESOLVED, THAT HEALTHY CHILDREN SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO FORCED VACCINATION (view supporting evidence)

· Negligible clinical risks from SARS-CoV-2 infection exist for healthy children under eighteen.

· Long term safety of the current COVID vaccines in children cannot be determined prior to instituting such policies. Without high-powered, reproducible, long term safety data, risks to the long-term health status of children remain too high to support use in healthy children.

· Children risk severe, adverse events from receiving the vaccine. Permanent physical damage to the brain, heart, immune and reproductive system associated with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-based genetic vaccines has been demonstrated in children.

· Healthy, unvaccinated children are critical to achieving herd immunity. Natural immunity is proven to tolerate infection, benefiting community protection while there is insufficient data to assess whether Covid vaccines assist herd immunity.

RESOLVED, THAT NATURALLY IMMUNE PERSONS RECOVERED FROM SARS-CoV-2 SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO ANY RESTRICTIONS OR VACCINE MANDATES (view supporting evidence)

· Natural immunity is the most protective, and longest-lasting solution against the development of COVID-19 disease and its more serious outcomes.

· Naturally immune persons are at the lowest risk of transmission, thus should not be subject to travel, professional, medical or social restrictions.

· Natural immunity provides the best source of herd immunity, a condition necessary for eradicating the Covid virus.

RESOLVED, THAT ALL HEALTH AGENCIES AND INSTITUTIONS SHALL CEASE INTERFERING WITH PHYSICIANS TREATING INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS (view supporting evidence)

· Early intervention with numerous, available agents has proven to be safe and effective, and has saved hundreds of thousands of lives.

· No medicine already given regulatory approval shall be restricted from “off-label” use, particularly during this global humanitarian crisis caused by a rapidly mutating virus, which requires quick to adopt treatment strategies.

· Health agencies shall be prohibited from interfering with physicians prescribing evidence-based treatments they deem necessary, and insurance companies must cease blocking payments for life-saving medicine prescribed by doctors.

RECOMMENDED LEGISLATIVE OR EXECUTIVE ACTION:

We believe that violating any of these three principles unnecessarily and directly risks death to our citizens. We hereby recommend the leaders of states, provinces and nations legislate or take executive action to prohibit the three practices described above.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Declaration.

Co-Signers

Physicians and Medical Scientists

Dr. Ira Bernstein, co-founder, Canadian Covid Care Alliance; lecturer, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto

Dr. Paul E. Alexander, clinical epidemiologist, former WHO-PAHO and US HHS consultant/senior Covid Pandemic advisor

Dr. Pierre Kory, critical care and pulmonary medicine specialist, former Chief of Critical Care Service and Medical Director of Trauma and Life Support Center at University of Wisconsin

Dr. Héctor Carvallo, former professor of Internal Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, former Director Ezeiza Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Dr. Mobeen Syed, physician, computer scientist, CEO of DrBeen Corp (US), clinical consultant (Pakistan)

Dr. Paul E. Marik, professor of medicine and Chief of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School

Dr. Flavio Cadegiani, endocrinologist & visiting professor, faculty of Floriano (FAESF); ad hoc consultant, Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa); consultant for National Commission for Incorporation of New Technologies, Devices and Drugs, Brazil

Dr. Marc G. Wathelet, molecular biologist, innate immunology and coronavirus expert, consultant, Belgium

Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director, The Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd; founder, British Ivermectin Recommendation Development; CEO of non-profit Ebmcsquared CiC

Dr. Eivind H. Vinjevoll, senior consultant of anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, chief medical advisor of emergency medicine, Volda, Norway

Dr. Heather Gessling, family medicine doctor in Columbia, Missouri

Dr. Mark McDonald, double board-certified child and adolescent psychiatrist, Los Angeles, California

Dr. Olufemi Emmanuel Babalola, professor of ophthalmology, IP HOD Surgery, Bingham University, Jos/Karu, Nigeria

Dr. Richard Urso, scientist, sole inventor of an FDA-approved wound healing drug, former Chief of Orbital Oncology at MD Anderson Cancer Center

Dr. John Littell, family physician, with practices in Kissimmee and Ocala, Florida

Dr. Ryan Cole, board-certified pathologist, CEO of Cole Diagnostics, Boise, Idaho

Dr. Brian Tyson, family medicine doctor, Urgent Care Covid Clinic, Imperial Valley, California

Prof. Andrea G. Stramezzi, Italy

Dr. Zsuszanna Ragó, specialist in coronavirus, primary care; IVERCOV project leader, University of Debrecen, Hungary

Dr. Robert W. Malone, gene therapy, bio-defense, vaccines and immunology; discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and architect of mRNA vaccine platform

Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter, critical care, pulmonary medicine, sleep medicine

Dr. Wong Ang Peng, Malaysian Alliance for Effective Covid Control (MAECC)

Dr. Peter McCullough, clinical cardiologist, preventive cardiology and advanced lipidology, former vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center

Dr. Jose Iglesias, associate professor, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, virology, vaccine R&D, former Sr Ebola Program Manager, Global Alliance for Vaccines & Immunization (GAVI), former Head of Vaccine Development Office, German Center for Infection Research

And thousands more physicians, medical scientists and researchers from around the globe.

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: December-02-21 2:33 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: THE PREVAILING CORONA NONSENSE NARRATIVE - DISASTROUS OVER-REACTION TO A PHONY PANDEMIC

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

https://www.thomasbinder.ch/post/the-prevailing-corona-nonsense-narrative

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians – it’s long past time for you to wake up!

THE PREVAILING CORONA NONSENSE NARRATIVE - DISASTROUS OVER-REACTION TO A PHONY PANDEMIC

Swiss cardiologist Dr Thomas Binder explodes the false myths of the Covid-19 “phony “pandemic”, which incompetent and corrupt governments and health authorities have grossly mismanaged - with enormous costs in destroyed economies and shattered lives.

The Covid-19 lockdowns were unjustified, costly, harmful and ineffective, and the Covid-19 “vaccines” were even more so – unjustified, costly, highly toxic and ineffective.

I cannot believe that the media were innocently duped in this matter – the corruption of governments and health authorities seems to also extend to the mainstream media.

It is simply not credible that so many people could be this remarkably gullible – this utterly wrong – for this long – there is ample evidence of criminal activity.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng,.

Calgary

From: Allan MacRae
Sent: December-02-21 2:00 AM
To: Brian Peckford
Subject: RE: [New post] The Prevailing Corona Nonsense Narrative

Thank you Brian,

I agree with every one of the ”top ten” conclusions of Dr Thomas Binder – I have independently reached all these same conclusions in my own extensive research.

Full report, 28Nov2021:

THE PREVAILING CORONA NONSENSE NARRATIVE

Regards, Allan

__________________

From: peckford42
Sent: December-02-21 12:13 AM
To: Allan MacRae
Subject: [New post] The Prevailing Corona Nonsense Narrative

New post on peckford42

The Prevailing Corona Nonsense Narrative

by brianpeckford

Analysis

·         Dr. Thomas Binder, a Swiss cardiologist and member of D4CE, has written a strong and accessible piece debunking the prevailing corona narrative for the general public. Thomas has documented three events which presaged the current corona fake pandemic:
·         The conjuring up, in 2006, of a fictitious epidemic of whooping cough, based on nothing more than PCR Testing: “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t”.
·         The Swine Flu Scandal, 2009: “Profiteers of Fear – The Swine Flu Racket” (German).
·         “Event 201:” Corona Pandemic Simulation, 2019. See the movie “Event 201: Corona Pandemic from the Drafting Table,” produced in German with English subtitles

Thomas also counters the “top 10” myths about the prevailing corona narrative with the following arguments:

1.     There is no epidemic of COVID-19 in any country – in most countries, there has been no excess mortality.
2.     It is wrong to test symptomatic people for only one of all respiratory viruses, and it is even more wrong to test asymptomatic people.
3.     The Corman-Drosten PCR protocol, which was hastily developed and prematurely adopted by the WHO, is technically flawed and not fit for the purpose of diagnosing an infection with the virus.
4.     Asymptomatic transmission of respiratory viruses is not epidemiologically relevant.
5.     Effective prevention measures and treatments for COVID-19 do exist.
6.     SARS-CoV-2 mutate slowly but inexorably. Therefore, even the most effective vaccines will always lag behind the new variants.
7.     SARS-CoV-2 is becoming more and more contagious indeed, but less and less dangerous, following the laws of evolution.
8.     SARS-CoV-2 does not occur perennially but seasonally from late fall to early spring.
9.     The basic and cross-immunity protect 80-90% of the population from contracting the seasonal beta corona and influenza viruses, which also applies to SARS-CoV-2.
10.        It is not possible to stop the alleged pandemic of the alleged killer virus through vaccination, since the vaccines, aside from causing grave disease, have also proven ineffective.

At the end of the article, Thomas supports his conclusions using real-time ICU occupancy data from Zurich ETH, as shown in the featured picture. The near-real-time monitoring of intensive care occupancy by ETH Zurich, dated November 26th, 2021, exposes the fundamental fraudulence of the prevailing corona narrative. The graph shows that each of the alleged spikes of COVID-19 cases is always mirrored by a decline in non-COVID cases, indicating misdiagnosis of other respiratory infections as COVID.
Thomas article is available in full from his website.

Source : Doctors for Covid Ethics

brianpeckford | December 2, 2021 at 7:13 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/p5XQfL-83M

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: November-29-21 5:56 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: UK COVID VACCINE FATALITY RATES – 1 DEATH PER 60 VACCINATED IN YEAR ONE – PROBABLY THE SAME IN CANADA

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

https://odysee.com/@HumanitysVault:a/Compilation---Athletes-Dying-After-Taking-Jab:5

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians – it’s long past time for you to wake up!

UK COVID VACCINE FATALITY RATES – 1 DEATH PER 60 VACCINATED IN YEAR ONE – PROBABLY THE SAME IN CANADA
by David Archibald, 26 November 2021

An excellent report. Author David Archibald is generally credible, and his estimate of ~first-year Covid-vaccine-caused deaths is much higher than my initial estimate. David’s estimate is based on total excess deaths, which is a good method when the data is available.

David wrote:

For the 42 million vaccinated in the UK, deaths due to vaccination will be of the order of 700,000.

That is one death per 60 Covid-19 vaccinated people – or 1/10th the odds of playing Russian roulette with a one-loaded six-shot revolver

David wrote further:
The spike protein has a myriad of ways of killing people, but the majority of deaths will be due to heart problems. The effect is noticeable in professional soccer, hence these recent headlines:

German Newspaper Shocked so Many Football Players Collapsed Recently
Mystery: ‘Large Number’ German Soccer Players Collapse With ‘Heart Issues’ Recently
Another Professional Soccer Player Collapses on Field: Emil Pálsson Suffers On-Field Cardiac Arrest, Is Resuscitated on Field
Sudden cardiac and unexplained deaths among FIFA athletes increased by 500% in 2021

The figure of a 500% increase in the death rate in the last headline agrees with the interpretation of Figure 2.

The vaccinated in the 30 to 60 age group are far more likely to become infected with covid than the unvaccinated. Assuming that the 10% of the infected become ‘long covid’, then the deleterious health effects from vaccination extend well beyond the 1.7% death rate in the first year.

If the effect of booster shots is the same as the 2^nd dose, then booster shots will come with a 1.7% chance of death in the first year.

Since January 2021 I've been urging people to not get these extremely dangerous Covid-19 injections, and have been dismissed and censored.

It’s too late for most people who have been injected, but we should immediately stop the current move to inject teenagers and children – this is madness and it must STOP now.

The Covid-19 booster programs should also be stopped immediately.

I never imagined it would be this difficult to stop people from killing/harming their own kids.

Regards, Allan MacRae

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: November-28-21 9:04 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: RE: WHY THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” ARE FAILING – THE DESIGN OF THE “VACCINES” WAS FLAWED FROM THE START – EXPERT MICROBIOLOGIST

Watch this video – look at all these fine young faces, struck down in the prime of their lives – thanks to you and your toxic Covid-19 “vaccines”. You must stop now!

As I predicted months ago:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/09/21/covid-1984-kfc-smugglers-and-brutal-police-repression/#comment-3350468

Watch professional sports in one year – most of the athletes who took the Covid-19 injection will have left the game – because they are no longer competitive. Professional athletes are highly-tuned humans, operating at the peak of fitness – they are the ‘canaries in the coal mine” and the vascular clogging caused by the injections will cause them sufficient harm to make them uncompetitive.

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: November-28-21 8:35 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: WHY THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” ARE FAILING – THE DESIGN OF THE “VACCINES” WAS FLAWED FROM THE START – EXPERT MICROBIOLOGIST

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

WHY THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” ARE FAILING – THE DESIGN OF THE “VACCINES” WAS FLAWED FROM THE START – EXPERT MICROBIOLOGIST

My friend Brian Peckford provides valuable information from expert microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi on why the Covid-19 “vaccines” are failing – the design of the “vaccines” was flawed from the start and they do much more harm than good.

Dr Bhakdi’s explanation is relatively simple and understandable for any intelligent person – but it will be difficult for those who have been pushing the “vaccines” to accept that they have been harming and killing so many innocent people. A D-dimer test will provide a partial assessment of early damage.

You should stop ALL Covid-19 “vaccine “ injections immediately – they are toxic - dangerous and ineffective, and are causing great harm to people of all ages, but especially to children.

I never imagined that it would be so difficult to stop people from killing/harming their own children.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.
Calgary

THE COVID VACCINES WERE DESIGNED TO FAIL (Nov. 25, 2021)
27/11/2021 by brian peckford

Videos

In this 10-minute video, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi discusses the fundamental reason for the current wave of “breakthrough infections:” the failure of the COVID vaccines had to be expected, because fundamental principles of immunology were ignored in their design. https://rumble.com/embed/vn9vu3/?pub=4#?secret=RB3KnTNSTw

The first mistake was to focus on antibodies rather than cellular immunity (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes) in assessing vaccine efficacy, even though cellular immunity is far more important to antiviral immunity than are antibodies.

The second mistake was to neglect the functional distinction between the two major categories of antibodies, which the body produces in order to protect itself from pathogenic microbes:

· The first category (secretory IgA) is produced by immune cells (lymphocytes) that are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract. The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are ejected through and to the surface of the linings. These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells.
· The second category of antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) occur in the bloodstream. These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream.

Vaccines that are injected into the muscle – i.e., the interior of the body – will only induce IgG and circulating IgA, not secretory IgA. Such antibodies cannot and will not effectively protect the mucous membranes from infection by SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the observed “breakthrough infections” merely confirm the fundamental design flaws of the vaccines. Measurements of antibodies in the blood can never yield any information on the true status of immunity against infection of the respiratory tract.

Further on, Dr. Bhakdi explains the dire dangers inherent in the design of the gene-based vaccines. Whereas a natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract, the vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature. Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen on its surface will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. This may occur in any organ, but the damage will be most severe in vital organs. We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death.

Dr. Bhakdi reiterates the deleterious effects of vaccine-induced immune attack on the blood vessels. While this damage, too, may occur anywhere within the body and give rise to e.g. stroke and heart attack, it can be observed in the most direct and facile manner by ophthalmologists, who may notice blood clots and/or bleeding when examining their patients’ retinas. Dr. Bhakdi calls on all ophthalmologists to collect, document and share such evidence.

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: November-27-21 7:20 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: DEATHS AMONG CHILDREN ARE 44% HIGHER THAN THE 5-YEAR-AVERAGE SINCE THEY WERE OFFERED THE COVID-19 VACCINE

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

DEATHS AMONG CHILDREN ARE 44% HIGHER THAN THE 5-YEAR-AVERAGE SINCE THEY WERE OFFERED THE COVID-19 VACCINE

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

DEATHS AMONG CHILDREN IN BRITAIN ARE 44% HIGHER THAN THE 5-YEAR-AVERAGE SINCE THEY WERE OFFERED THE COVID-19 VACCINE.
Britain is months ahead of Canada in its failed toxic Covid-19 vaccine strategy - the British experience predicts events that will happen soon in Canada.

You are not listening and you should listen. I am vastly more accomplished than any of you, and am much more competent in technical analysis. According to experts, I was instrumental in revitalizing the Alberta and Canadian economies for decades starting in the 1990’s. Recently I saved ~300,000 Calgarians from possible/probable death by causing the shutdown of the dangerously-mismanaged Mazeppa sour gas project. These are just some of my accomplishments in a career that spanned six continents.

MY OBJECTIVE HERE IS SIMPLE – TO SAVE THE LIVES OF OUR CHILDREN, WHO YOU ARE KILLING OR PERMANENTLY HARMING WITH YOUR TOXIC COVID-19 “VACCINE” INJECTIONS.
These injections are much more dangerous to children than the Covid-19 virus. If you are too stupid or callous to understand this, you should step down and allow competent people do your jobs. This is not complicated – you are causing great harm with your failed lockdown-and-injection strategies, and every time you fail you then double-down, repeat your errors and cause even more harm.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng., Calgary

By The Exposé, November 24, 2021

Official data published by the Office for National Statistics proves that deaths among children have increased significantly compared to the five-year-average since they were offered the Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 vaccine.

On September 13th 2021, Professor Chris Whitty the Chief Medical Officer for England, wrote to the UK Government advising them that all children over the age of 12 should be offered at least one dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.

This was despite the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) refusing to do so due to concluding the benefits do not necessarily outweigh the risks. The reason they concluded this is due to the negligible amount of children who suffer serious illness due to Covid-19, let alone die, and the real possibility of children suffering myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) as an adverse reaction.

For the first time in history the UK Government chose to ignore the advice of the JCVI and instead opted to roll-out the Covid-19 injection to all children over the age of 12 with immediate effect.

The following analysis of Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows the consequences of that decision, so far…

The ONS publishes weekly figures on deaths in 2021 which can be accessed here, and they have a previously published a ‘2015-2019, Five-Year Average’ dataset on deaths which can be accessed here.

We have used the figures from both datasets for our analysis, both can be downloaded so that you can confirm our figures are correct –

· Download the 2021 Dataset on Deaths (Up to Week 45)

· Download the 2015 – 2019, 5-year-average Dataset on Deaths

September 13th, the day Chris Whitty advised the UK Government to offer the Covid vaccine to children, fell in week 37 of 2021. Thanks to plans already put in place under the instruction of the Health Secretary Sajid Javid, the NHS were ready to start injecting children with immediate effect, so we have analysed all deaths occurring from week 38 onwards.

The following chart shows the number of deaths per week, between week 38 and week 45, among all children aged 10-14 in England and Wales, in 2021 and the 2015-2019 5-year-average dataset.

Deaths among children aged 10-14 have been higher than the five-year-average every single week since they were offered a Covid-19 injection except for week 42. The highest number of deaths fell in week 40, with 11 deaths being registered compared to the 4 that occurred in the 5-year-average dataset. This represents a 175% increase in deaths in week 40 alone.

The following chart shows the cumulative number of deaths per week, between week 38 and week 45, among all children aged 10-14 in England and Wales, in 2021 and the 2015-2019 5-year-average dataset.

Between week 38 and week 45 in the five-year-average dataset, a total of 41 deaths among children aged 10-14 occurred. But during the same timeframe this year a total of 59 deaths have occurred among children. This represents a 44% increase on the five-year-average since they were offered a Covid-19 injection.

The following chart shows the number of deaths per week, between week 38 and week 45, among all male children aged 10-14 in England and Wales, in 2021 and the 2015-2019 5-year-average dataset.

Deaths among male children aged 10-14 have been higher than the five-year-average every single week since they were offered a Covid-19 injection except for week 42 and 43 where they were lower, and week 44 where they were the same. The highest number of deaths fell in week 40, with 7 deaths being registered compared to the 2 that occurred in the 5-year-average dataset. This represents a 250% increase in deaths in week 40 alone.

The following chart shows the cumulative number of deaths per week, between week 38 and week 45, among all male children aged 10-14 in England and Wales, in 2021 and the 2015-2019 5-year-average dataset.

Between week 38 and week 45 in the five-year-average dataset, a total of 24 deaths among male children aged 10-14 occurred. But during the same timeframe this year a total of 34 deaths have occurred among male children. This represents a 42% increase on the five-year-average since they were offered a Covid-19 injection.

The following chart shows the number of deaths per week, between week 38 and week 45, among all female children aged 10-14 in England and Wales, in 2021 and the 2015-2019 5-year-average dataset.

Deaths among female children aged 10-14 have been higher than the five-year-average every single week since they were offered a Covid-19 injection except for week 41 where they were lower, and week 42 and 45 where they were the same. The highest number of deaths fell in week 40, with 4 deaths being registered compared to the 2 that occurred in the 5-year-average dataset. This represents a 100% increase in deaths in week 40 alone.

The following chart shows the cumulative number of deaths per week, between week 38 and week 45, among all female children aged 10-14 in England and Wales, in 2021 and the 2015-2019 5-year-average dataset.

Between week 38 and week 45 in the five-year-average dataset, a total of 17 deaths among female children aged 10-14 occurred. But during the same timeframe this year a total of 25 deaths have occurred among female children. This represents a 47% increase on the five-year-average since they were offered a Covid-19 injection.

Quite clearly these numbers are not astronomically high but there is good reason for this in that children don’t generally die. Which should make it all the more concerning that we are seeing a significant increase in deaths among children since they were offered a Covid-19 injection.

Correlation does not of course equal causation but there seems to be a mountain of coincidences forming in relation to the Covid-19 vaccines. Is this just another coincidence, or are these injections to blame?

The only thing that’s certain is that UK authorities should be urgently investigating why deaths among children, male children, and female children are 44%, 42%, and 47% higher than the five-year-average since they were offered a Covid-19 injection.

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: November-24-21 8:26 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: RE: “FOR EVERY CHILD SAVED BY THE SHOT, ANOTHER 117 WOULD BE KILLED”

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

THE WHO IS AN INSTITUTION OF CORRUPTION
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of health at the Council of Europe, explains how the WHO deceived everyone with a false pandemic.
This is not a complicated story – it is global fraud – and our governments have been far too stupid and corrupt to recognize it.

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked November 24, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

·    Fundamental corruption at the World Health Organization (WHO) contributed to manufacturing a “test pandemic”
·    Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of health at the Council of Europe, explains that a pandemic used to be associated with widespread severe illness and death, but by changing the definition, removing the severity and high mortality criteria, WHO can now make a pandemic whenever it wants
·    COVID-19 was a “test” pandemic, not a virus pandemic, because PCR tests may give a positive result when it detects fragments of coronaviruses that have been around for 20 years, a fragment of virus too small to make you ill or a fragment of COVID-19 that was there weeks ago
·    The mass COVID-19 shot campaign is riddled with conflicts of interest at a fundamental level, and these conflicts are putting people’s lives at risk by putting vaccine production ahead of disease prevention
·    As Wodarg noted, if you want to earn money producing vaccines, you need new markets in which to use them, and new diseases so you can sell your vaccine

Video: https://rumble.com/vnwzlh-wolfgang-wodarg-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: November-22-21 5:57 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: RE: “FOR EVERY CHILD SAVED BY THE SHOT, ANOTHER 117 WOULD BE KILLED”

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

“SWEDEN HAS HAD *NEGATIVE* EXCESS MORTALITY SINCE THE START OF 2020”

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

“HOPE IS ALREADY LOST FOR THE HEAVILY INJECTED POPULATIONS OF THE WORLD”
- Dr Geert Vanden Boscche, Virologist and Vaccine Expert, November 17, 2021,

https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/

Canada can expect another strong wave of alleged Covid-19 deaths and severe injuries this winter. The primary cause of these adverse reactions will be the Covid-19 “vaccines”, not the virus. Deaths and injuries will be concentrated in populations that have received one or more Covid-19 injections, the partially or fully Covid-19-vaccinated, similar to Israel, Britain, Australia.

Our governments will maintain their false narrative that more lockdowns and “vaccine booster shots” are the answer – this will prove 100% wrong and will cause even more harm.

For the record, I am fully vaccinated, except for these toxic and ineffective Covid-19 “vaccines”. I am not an “anti-vaxxer” – but the Covid-19 injections are dangerous “kill shots”.

“FOR EVERY CHILD SAVED BY THE SHOT, ANOTHER 117 WOULD BE KILLED”

- Toby Rogers, PhD, MPP,

https://drtobyrogers.com/

I published in ~~June~~ January 2021 that the Covid-19 vaccines were dangerous and ineffective – many lives would have been saved, IF you had listened.

Even the stupidest politicians and media must now realize that the Covid-19 “ vaccines” are NOT SAFE AND NOT EFFECTIVE and are ESPECIALLY WRONG FOR CHILDREN AND TEENAGERS!

Pushing these toxic, deadly Covid-19 “vaccines” on everyone WAS criminal negligence, but now it is premeditated – NOW IT IS MURDER and GENOCIDE.

I published on March 21, 2020, 20 months ago that the general lockdowns were not justified and were going to do far more harm than good – the above fact from Sweden proves that I was correct. Sweden did not lockdown and has better total mortality results than most countries that did.

QUESTIONS:

How is it that our governments, with their near-infinite resources, have completely botched every aspect of the Covid-19 illness since its beginning circa early 2020?

Is it possible that any rational individual or group could be this completely wrong for this long, with failure following failure, or is something more sinister happening?

It is extremely improbable that any individual or group could be so obtuse, so impervious to obvious facts, for such a long time. The probability of corruption is high.

“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.” - Thomas Sowell

Regards, Allan MacRae

Calgary

STARK WARNINGS FROM DOCTORS VANDEN BOSCCHE, ALEXANDER, STOCK, AND TROZZI

We are witnessing the highest rates of infection, hospitalization, and death in the nations that are most "vaccinated"

DR GEERT VANDEN BOSCCHE RAISES THE ALARM ON THE DESTRUCTION OF INNATE IMMUNITY

Dr Geert Vanden Boscche is a world class virologist, immunologist, and vaccinologist. He is the consummate insider and whistle blower. His extensive career has included high level positions with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as GAVI.

Video:

Dr Vanden Boscche starts at 1:10

Three day ago on November 17, 2021 he gave this detailed warning at the African Health Summit. He expressed his educated concern that hope is already lost for the heavily injected populations of the world; before he pleaded with the people of Africa to reject the injections before they are on the same path to mass immune system failure, widespread disease and death.

REVEALING THE GRIM REALITY OF VACCINE-INDUCED ANTIBODY MEDIATED SELECTION

The so-called “vaccines” are wreaking havoc on individuals and populations.

Beyond the record setting initial adverse events and deaths from these forced injection campaigns, we are also facing these other developing catastrophes:

damaged immune systems,
enhanced coronavirus disease,
dangerous new variants,
injection victims becoming super-spreaders
blocking of the development of healthy herd immunity that would be achieved without these injections,
and disruptions of the innate immunity in young and old, “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated”, that will cause: severe coronavirus disease; worsening of many other infections that will break through the damaged immune systems; autoimmune diseases; and crippling persistent effects on children’s immune systems.

These so-called “vaccines” are leaky, meaning that they may reduce symptoms, but they do not eliminate the virus, nor block infection or transmission. The injection victims have higher viral loads in their respiratory tracts and their symptoms are buffered, so they are more likely to spread infection. These victims’ virus-loaded respiratory systems are evolutionary hotbeds where the coronaviruses can live, and evolve into more dangerous variants. In 2020 we were lied to about “Asymptomatic spread” in natural people; however now the injections are creating super-spreaders .

It is true that the injections are already demonstrating severe harms to the subjects, and that sadly, there is lots more to come in this respect. However, we now see that it is also true that the injection victims harbour and evolving pools of corona-viruses, obstruct herd immunity, and maintain a constant presence of corona-virus in the population that drains the innate immunity even in the “unvaccinated”. So the injection campaigns put us all in grave danger.

For more details and proof of these matters, see this recent article by Dr Paul Alexander with input of Doctors Dan Stock and Mark Trozzi.
https://drtrozzi.org/2021/11/21/revealing-the-grim-reality-of-vaccine-induced-antibody-mediated-selection/

COULD BOOSTERS BACKFIRE?—DR. PAUL ALEXANDER ON BOOSTER SHOTS, NATURAL IMMUNITY, AND THE FAILURES OF LOCKDOWNS | PART 1

Video: 20 November 2021

“We do not know how the immune system is going to react to so much boosting. Why? Because the vaccine developers did not study it.”

In this two-part episode, we sit down with Brownstone Institute’s Paul Alexander, an expert in evidence-based medicine, research methodology, and clinical epidemiology. He served in the Trump administration in Health and Human Services as a COVID-19 policy adviser. He breaks down the extensive data on natural immunity, the failures of lockdown policies, and the risks associated with COVID vaccines for children.

“If you say these vaccines are safe for my children, if you stand by them … remove the liability protection [for vaccine developers]. Then we will talk about vaccinating children,” Alexander said.

SWEDEN HAS HAD *NEGATIVE* EXCESS MORTALITY SINCE THE START OF 2020

By Noah Carl / 20 November 2021

We all remember what happened last year when Sweden’s unflappable state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell announced there wouldn’t be a lockdown. His “trust-based” approach was roundly denounced – not only in the media, but also by some ‘experts’.

As Johan Anderberg notes, Sweden’s pandemic strategy was variously described as “deadly folly” (Guardian), “a disaster” (Time magazine) and “the world’s cautionary tale” (New York Times).

Since the end of the first wave, however, Sweden has been gradually creeping down the list of countries by official Covid death rate. As of 16th October, it was ranked 52nd – well below the European average.

Yet this actually understates how well Sweden has done. As I and others have consistently argued, number of Covid deaths per million is not the best measure of the pandemic’s impact on mortality. Far better is age-adjusted excess mortality.

Thanks to an ONS report published on Thursday, we now have age-adjusted excess mortality numbers for most of the countries in Europe, covering the entire period from January 2020 to June 2021.

As an aside, the report clearly states: “The best way of comparing the mortality impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic internationally is by looking at all-cause mortality compared with the five-year average.”

So what do the new numbers show? Sweden has had negative excess mortality. In other words, the level of mortality between January 2020 and June 2021 was lower than the five-year average. If this isn’t a vindication of Anders Tegnell’s approach, I don’t know what is.

The table below (taken from the ONS report) shows age-adjusted excess mortality from 3rd January 2020 to 18th June 2021. As you can see, Sweden is 8^th from bottom, with a value of –2.3%.

Interestingly, the bottom six are all small, geographically peripheral countries (three islands, plus Denmark, Norway and Finland). This suggests that geography and border controls were key, and that lockdowns – in the absence of effective border controls – didn’t make much difference.

The top seven are all in Eastern Europe, which again suggests that some geographic factor is at work. What may account for high excess mortality in these countries is the fact that all of them missed the first wave, and hence had even bigger epidemics in the winter. Official Covid death rates are shown below:

If true, this would constitute strong evidence against the House of Commons’ report, which concluded that Britain should have tried to suppress the first wave. As I’ve noted before, this approach always carried the risk of creating an even bigger epidemic in the winter.

In any event, Anders Tegnell can give himself a well-deserved pat on the back. His country kept civil liberties largely intact, and ended up with one of Europe’s lowest death tolls. Well done, professor.

By Noah Carl / 20 November 2021 • 15.23

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: November-21-21 3:31 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; 'jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca'
Subject: “FOR EVERY CHILD SAVED BY THE SHOT, ANOTHER 117 WOULD BE KILLED”

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education