Allan’s Newsletter

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

THE SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT STORY BEHIND IVERMECTIN

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

Subject: IVERMECTIN CURES COVID-19 - ADULT DOSE 12mg X 5 DAYS, COST $1 PER CURE

Many lives would have been saved and our economy much stronger if, two years ago, we had sent all these toxic Covid-19 vaccine-pushing politicians. their incompetent advisors and their “bought” mainstream media to Baffin Island - and left them there.

SCIENTIFIC COMPETENCE – THE ABILITY TO CORRECTLY PREDICT
by Allan MacRae October 20, 2021. Update November 8, 2021, Update January 14, 2022

https://correctpredictions.ca/

“The ability to correctly predict is the best objective measure of scientific and technical competence.”

My predictive track record on Climate-and Covid is infinitely more accurate than the failed notions of our governments and their advisors.

For the record:

In 2002 we correctly published that there was no real global warming crisis, and grid-connected green energy schemes would fail.

My open letter to UK Undersecretary of Energy Baroness Verma in 2013 accurately predicted the current climate-and-energy crisis in Britain. The global warming-and-green-energy narrative has proved very costly, entirely false and extremely harmful.

On 21March2020 I correctly stated that the Covid-19 lockdowns were counterproductive, and we should just focus on over-protecting the very elderly and infirm – essentially the same as the Great Barrington Declaration by top experts of October 2021.

On 8January2021 I wrote our governments that the Covid-19 “vaccines” were toxic and ineffective and would cause much more harm than good. Vaccine-caused deaths and lifelong injuries have reached epidemic proportions and will continue for years. Many of the deaths and severe illnesses attributed to the Covid-19 viruses were actually caused by the toxic “vaccines”.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

Calgary

Analysis By Dr. Joseph Mercola January 26, 2022

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

·    In mid-February 2021, Dr. Andrew Hill at Liverpool University published a scientific meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials involving the use of ivermectin. The review, funded by the World Health Organization and UNITAID, found the drug increased viral clearance and reduced COVID-19 deaths by 75%, yet the conclusion of the paper was dismissive
·    In early April 2021, Hill was accused of scientific misconduct by the French civic group, Association BonSens. BonSens claims Hill manipulated data to downplay the usefulness of ivermectin. Hill admitted that the study sponsor had crafted the conclusion
·    In early August 2021, Hill published a public notice stating one of the six studies included in his analysis had been withdrawn due to fraudulent data. A revised analysis excluding that study was published in November 2021
·    In the November revision, Hill included 23 randomized clinical trials, concluding ivermectin had no statistically significant effect on survival or hospitalizations
·    Other meta-analyses of 13 to 24 studies have found reductions in death ranging from 62% to 91%. Recent research has also found a five-day course of ivermectin at a dose of 12 mg per day sped up viral clearance, reducing the duration of symptomatic illness by three days compared to placebo (9.7 days versus 12.7 days)

Videos:
News Roundup | Scientific Misconduct Accusation with Dr. Andrew Hill's Ivermectin Meta-Analysis - YouTube
News Roundup | Dr. Tess Lawrie Discusses her Ivermectin Meta-Analysis, the FDA, and Dr. Andrew Hill (rumble.com)

In mid-February 2021, Dr. Andrew Hill at Liverpool University published a scientific meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials involving the use of ivermectin in 1,255 COVID-19 patients. (The paper was initially posted on a preprint server.)

The review, which was funded by the World Health Organization and UNITAID, found that ivermectin increased viral clearance and reduced COVID-19 deaths by 75%. This is a rather massive benefit, yet the conclusion of the paper was dismissive, saying additional large clinical trials were needed to make a determination about whether or not to recommend its use.

Hill Accused of Scientific Misconduct

In early April 2021, Hill and his coauthors were accused of scientific misconduct by a French civic group called the Association BonSens. The TrialSite News video report from April 5 above reviews the details of this story. BonSens — labeled by some a “controversial group” based on its anti-mask mandate stance — accused Hill of data manipulation to downplay the usefulness of ivermectin.

According to BonSens, Hill’s analysis was then used by the WHO to recommend against ivermectin, even though it appears to have significant benefit. BonSens called on Hill to retract the paper, but Hill remained “resolute and stands behind the study,” TrialSite News said.

At the time, TrialSite News claimed to have been in conversation with “relevant and associated parties,” some of whom have asked to remain anonymous, who say Hill’s study was in fact modified, but that this was done “separate and apart from the investigator,” and that Hill had no say in the matter.

However, since then, one of the six studies Hill included in his analysis has been withdrawn “due to fraudulent data.” In a public notice¹ dated August 9, 2021, Hill and his coauthors addressed the matter, saying they would submit “a revised version excluding this study, and the currently posted paper will be retracted.” A revised and updated meta-analysis was published in November 2021.²

The updated review includes data from 23 randomized clinical trials with a total of 3,349 patients. Studies with “high risk of bias” were excluded. In this analysis, Hill found that “Ivermectin did not show a statistically significant effect on survival or hospitalizations,” and had only “borderline significant effect on duration of hospitalization in comparison with standard of care.”

No significant effect on clinical recovery time was detected. In conclusion, the paper states that the WHO “recommends the use of ivermectin only inside clinical trials.” Curiously, it also states that “a network of large clinical trials is in progress to validate the results seen to date.” What results might those be? Surely, they must be referring to positive results, or else a network of clinical trials would hardly be justified.

Positive Ivermectin Studies Largely Barred From Publication

December 3, 2021, TrialSite News interviewed Dr. Tess Laurie (above) about her own ivermectin analyses and that of Hill. She points out that she was concerned when she saw the initial meta-analysis Hill published, as the conclusion didn’t match the data. The reduction in death was significant, yet the conclusion was dismissive.

Laurie contacted Hill, asking him to explain his conclusion to her. He then told her that the conclusion of the paper was not his own. It had been written by his sponsor — the WHO. Laurie was shocked, she said, as this struck her as a clear conflict of interest.

In the interview, Laurie also discusses the general difficulty researchers have had, since the beginning, in getting papers published that support ivermectin. She admits her own team has downplayed the benefits by using extremely conservative analyses in an effort to get published.

“It seems, if you tell it like it is, you are not going to get published because you might be accused of overstating your case. And if you understate it, you’re told there’s not enough evidence,” Laurie says.

Strong Evidence for Ivermectin

According to Laurie, the evidence for ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19 is strong. In a previous interview, she reviewed a 13-study meta-analysis that found a 68% reduction in deaths. A follow-up review that included 15 studies found a 62% to 72% reduction in deaths.³

A five-day course of ivermectin at a dose of 12 mg per day sped up viral clearance, reducing the duration of symptomatic illness by three days compared to placebo (9.7 days versus 12.7 days).

A meta-analysis⁴ by Laurie and her team published in the July-August 2021 issue of the American Journal of Therapeutics, which included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 3,406 participants, reported reductions in death ranging between 79% and 91%.

A study published February 2021 also reported that a five-day course of ivermectin at a dose of 12 mg per day sped up viral clearance, reducing the duration of symptomatic illness by three days compared to placebo (9.7 days versus 12.7 days).⁵

According to Laurie, what makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is that it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are required, and in the later inflammatory stage, when the viral load drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary.

Dr. Surya Kant, a medical doctor in India who has written a white paper⁶ on ivermectin, claims the drug reduces replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by several thousand times.⁷ Kant’s paper led several Indian provinces to start using ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and as treatment for COVID-19 in the summer of 2020.⁸

Africa and Japan Defy the Odds With Ivermectin

Japan and Africa have also defied the odds with ivermectin. As reported by NewsRescue at the end of August 2021, “Melinda Gates, co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation predicted disaster in the developing world, but so far she has been dead wrong, at least as far as Africa is concerned.”⁹

Indeed, despite having nearly 1.4 billion people, Africa has maintained one of the lowest COVID caseloads and death rates in the world, accounting for just 4% of the global reported death rate as of mid-May 2021.¹⁰ While media feign confusion, ivermectin may well be the explanation for this phenomenon.

A study¹¹ published at the end of December 2020 found that African countries that participated in the African Program for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), where intensive ivermectin mass campaigns were carried out between 1995 and 2015, had 28% lower COVID-19 mortality and 8% lower infection rates than non-APOC countries that did not participate in the ivermectin campaign.

“That a mass public health preventive campaign against COVID-19 may have taken place, inadvertently, in some African countries with massive community ivermectin use is an attractive hypothesis,” the authors said.¹²

Similarly, Japan has seen a massive decline in cases after adopting ivermectin as standard treatment against COVID. November 3, 2021, Free West Media reported:¹³

“The head of the Tokyo Medical Association appeared on national television in September urging doctors to use Ivermectin and they listened. A little over a month later, COVID-19 is under control in Japan ...

Japan had slavishly adhered to all the Big Pharma prescriptions, including quarantine, contact tracing, masking, social distance, but finally the pandemic had hit them hard after they started aggressive vaccination in May 2021.

The results looked good initially, but in mid-July they started rising again and on August 6 cases hit a new all-time high and continued to rise.

Ivermectin was allowed as a treatment on August 13 and after 2 weeks the cases started to come down. In fact, they are now down 99% from the peak ... In Japan, doctors can now prescribe it without restrictions, and people can buy it legally from India.”

Doctors Urge Acceptance of Ivermectin to Save Lives

In the U.S., the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has been calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19.^14,15

FLCCC president Dr. Pierre Kory, former professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has testified to the benefits of ivermectin before a number of COVID-19 panels, including the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in December 2020,¹⁶ and the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel January 6, 2021.¹⁷ As noted by the FLCCC:¹⁸

“The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.

Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a ‘miracle drug’ against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities … to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19¹⁹ …

… numerous clinical studies — including peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials — showed large magnitude benefits of Ivermectin in prophylaxis, early treatment and also in late-stage disease. Taken together … dozens of clinical trials that have now emerged from around the world are substantial enough to reliably assess clinical efficacy.”²⁰

A one-page summary²¹ of the clinical trial evidence for Ivermectin can be downloaded from the FLCCC website. A more comprehensive, 31-page review²² of trials data has been published in the journal Frontiers of Pharmacology.

At the time of this writing, the number of trials involving ivermectin has risen to 71, including 31 randomized controlled trials. A listing of all the ivermectin trials done to date, with links to the published studies, can be found on c19Ivermectin.com.²³

The FLCCC’s COVID-19 protocol was initially dubbed MATH+ (an acronym based on the key components of the treatment), but after several tweaks and updates, the prophylaxis and early outpatient treatment protocol is now known as I-MASK+²⁴ while the hospital treatment has been renamed I-MATH+,²⁵ due to the addition of ivermectin.

The two protocols^26,27 are available for download on the FLCCC Alliance website in multiple languages.

Take Control of Your Health Care

If COVID-19 were an actual medical crisis and not an excuse for a tyrannical power grab, doctors would have been allowed, indeed encouraged, to work together to find solutions. Their successes would then have been announced everywhere. Without doubt, ivermectin would have featured heavily in such reports, as doctors around the world have attested to its benefits.

That’s not what happened, though, which tells us we’re not dealing with a medical crisis that governments actually want to solve. As reported by the FLCCC, its members have “been blocked in attempts to disseminate scientific information about ivermectin on Facebook and other social media with the FLCCC’s pages repeatedly being shut down.”²⁸

Seasoned researchers like Laurie can’t get their research published, and the main thing they have in common is that they’re reporting positive results using ivermectin (and other common remedies). For nearly two years now, doctors and scientist have repeatedly shown we can control the COVID endemic, even with new variants. We can save the vast majority from severe illness and death.

Yet “authorities” within government, regulatory agencies and health agencies have refused to listen and insist there’s only one way forward — we need novel gene transfer injections that direct our cells to churn out the very toxin that makes COVID-19 so problematic. And when those shots are proven failures, the answer, these same “leaders” say, is more boosters!

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results. The good news is you can choose who you listen to. You can listen to frontline medical experts, like the FLCCC, and follow their advice.

COVID-19 CAN BE STOPPED WITHOUT MASSIVE VACCINATION: DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH

By Harry Lee and Steve Lance January 25, 2022 Updated: January 25, 2022

COVID-19 can be stopped without massive vaccination, renowned cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough told NTD’s “Capitol Report” program during the “Defeat the Mandates” march in Washington D.C., on Jan. 23.

According to McCullough, early treatment and natural immunity are safe and effective against COVID-19, but federal health agencies have ignored these in a push for vaccines, the broad use of which is not needed.

“The government has certainly been in an oblivion in terms of early treatment,” he said.

Thousands of people turned out to march in protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates—one of the largest U.S. events against the mandates since the start of the pandemic.

Play Video (from within article)

“Our CDC, FDA, and NIH have had no effective messaging on early treatment, even the emergency use authorized monoclonal antibodies, which are safe and effective,” McCullough said. “And even on the new Merck and Pfizer drugs, which they’re basically absent in terms of the media, despite being recently distributed across the United States.”

Early effective treatment of any disease can help avert progression to more serious illness, with an additional benefit of reducing the burden on health care systems.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated on its website that according to the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), “current clinical management of COVID-19 consists of infection prevention and control measures and supportive care, including supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilatory support when indicated.”

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved one drug, remdesivir (Veklury), to treat COVID-19 in hospitalized patients, the CDC continued.

On Monday, the FDA announced that it is restricting the use of two monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19, saying data show such treatments are “highly unlikely” to be active against the Omicron variant.

A crowd gathers at Lincoln Memorial for the “Defeat the Mandates” rally in Washington on Jan. 23, 2022. (Lynn Lin/NTD)

McCullough said that highly qualified doctors have done the research and have shown that “early treatment can end this pandemic by reducing the intensity and severity of disease and reducing the chances of hospitalization and death in our highest risk seniors.”

“This basically means that the vaccines broadly used aren’t needed. And in fact, we have seen far too many vaccine injuries and now vaccine failures. With the Omicron variant, there’s effectively no coverage of these vaccines against the newest form of the virus,” McCullough said, adding 22 studies showed vaccines ran out of efficacy after six months.

McCullough gave the example of how ivermectin, a Nobel prize-winning, FDA-approved drug that many studies and doctors claim is effective in treating COVID-19 patients, was dismissed by federal health agencies.

The FDA has been saying the drug was approved to treat internal and external parasites, and currently no data shows its effectiveness against COVID-19.

McCullough also claimed that the federal health agencies have ignored natural immunity, which is “robust, complete, and durable in terms of the lethal strains of the virus.”

“It was only until it got to the Omicron variant, which there was a breakthrough, and individuals who are previously immune could get a mild Omicron syndrome. But natural immunity is the end of the pandemic,” McCullough continued. “Remember, as we all become naturally immune, COVID-19 is no longer a threat to our lives.

“And the failure of our governmental agencies to recognize natural immunity has basically created unnecessary suffering, unnecessary testing, unnecessary masking and social distancing. Unnecessary compliance with all kinds of measures that are designed for the susceptible. Those who are naturally immune are no longer susceptible to fatal disease.”

McCullough expressed doubt about the claim that COVID-19 vaccines could reduce hospitalization and deaths.

“All we have at this point of time is bias-confounded, and I think invalid hospitalization data. The U.S. agencies still make the claim that the vaccines protect against hospitalization, whereas we see no evidence of that in the UK, Germany, South Africa, and the rest of the world,” McCullough said. “And I can tell you, the United States is not that different than the rest of these countries. Something is wrong. And I can tell you something is wrong with an incorrect, invalid claim that the vaccines reduce hospitalization. I don’t think it’s supportable.”

On Jan. 19, the CDC published a study showing that people who had not gotten a vaccine but did have a prior infection, also known as natural immunity, were less likely to land in a hospital than the vaccinated without natural immunity.

The Epoch Times has contacted CDC for additional comment.

Last month, President Joe Biden announced new measures to battle COVID-19, the top three of which are boosters for all adults, vaccinations to protect kids, and expanding free at-home testing. Biden did talk about the new treatment, saying that “if and when any new COVID-19 treatment pills have been found to meet FDA’s scientific standards, they are equitably accessible to all Americans.”

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: January-21-22 5:28 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca
Subject: MOST POLITICIANS AND MEDIA HAVE BEEN IMPERVIOUS TO LOGIC AND FACTS. MAYBE, LIKE SHEEP, THEY RESPOND TO MUSIC.

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

WATCH: NHS DOCTOR TELLS PATIENT NOT TO TAKE COVID VACCINE BECAUSE THEY WILL BE PULLED SOON – WARNS THAT VACCINE DATA IS BEING HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

Subject: MOST POLITICIANS AND MEDIA HAVE BEEN IMPERVIOUS TO LOGIC AND FACTS. MAYBE, LIKE SHEEP, THEY RESPOND TO MUSIC.

Listen:

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

Calgary

Society would be much better-off if two years ago, we had just sent all these Covid-panicking politicians and their advisors to Baffin Island and left them there.

PART 2: DR. ROBERT MALONE ON RISKS OF VACCINATING CHILDREN, HERD IMMUNITY MISCONCEPTIONS, AND THE OMICRON-VACCINE MISMATCH
In part two of this interview, Dr. Malone discusses how the COVID-19 vaccines are faring against Omicron, how the concept of herd immunity has been grossly misunderstood, and why he’s deeply concerned about vaccine mandates for children.
January 11, 2022
“They’re being forced onto your children. And they have risks. And the media—through its censorship—and Big Tech [are] blocking your ability to even learn what those risks are so you can make an informed decision for your children yourself. That is a huge crime.””

EXCLUSIVE: NATIONWIDE SURGE IN DEATHS AMONG PEOPLE AGED 18-49: A STATE BY STATE OVERVIEW
Highest state sees 65 percent increase in prime-age mortality, only 36 percent attributed to COVID-19
By Petr Svab January 12, 2022 Updated: January 13, 2022

SHOCK VIDEO: NHS Doctor Says “All The Vaccines Will Be Recalled Soon” (banned.video)
January 17, 2022

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: January-15-22 2:44 PM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca
Subject: MASSIVE DEATHS WITHIN 14 DAYS AND 180 DAYS OF THE COVID INJECTIONS IMPORTANT!!!

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/01/15/climate-activists-stepping-up-efforts-to-ensnare-your-kids/#comment-3432722

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

Subject: MASSIVE DEATHS WITHIN 14 DAYS AND 180 DAYS OF THE COVID INJECTIONS

IMPORTANT!!! THE SMOKING GUN. DO NOT INJECT YOUR KIDS.

Massive deaths within 14 days and 180 days of the Covid injections.

Excellent work from Alberta Covid-19 Statistics by Jeremy Poole, the Family Man.

ALBERTA STATS, SHOW VACCINE CAUSES COVID AND DEATH, THEN IT'S CENSORED?? (bitchute.com)

Censored:
https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes
Wayback Machine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220113223604/https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes

MASSIVE PEAK IN COVID-19 CASES IMMEDIATELY AFTER VACCINE INJECTIONS, AND AGAIN AFTER 180 DAYS

MASSIVE PEAK IN COVID-19 HOSPITALIZATIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER VACCINE INJECTIONS, AND AGAIN AFTER 180 DAYS

MASSIVE PEAK IN COVID-19 DEATHS IMMEDIATELY AFTER VACCINE INJECTIONS, AND AGAIN AFTER 180 DAYS

TOLD YOU SO, ONE YEAR AGO.
For the record - emailed to the Alberta government 8January2021

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE COVID-19

There is no real Covid-19 pandemic. Covid-19 was only dangerous to the very elderly and infirm, and is similar in average mortality to other seasonal flu’s of recent decades.

The Covid-19 PCR test is not fit-for-purpose and provides many false positives.

Routine testing of asymptomatic people is a waste of resources and drives erroneous policies including lockdowns.

The Covid-19 lockdowns were never effective or justified. Harm done by the lockdowns exceeds by 10 to 100 times the harm from Covid-19. End all lockdowns now and do not lockdown again.

Simple, inexpensive treatments are known to save lives – Vitamin D, Ivermectin etc. Why are these treatments not being widely recommended and implemented by Alberta authorities?

The increase in deaths of the elderly in Winter is a well-established seasonal phenomenon. “Excess Winter Deaths” in the four Winter months routinely average about 100,000 per year in the USA and about 10,000 per year in Canada, as described on our 2015 Summary of Excess Winter Mortality that includes the landmark Lancet study.

...

The Covid-19 vaccine developments were rushed and are not proven safe or effective and should NOT be taken, especially by the low-risk population - those under-65 or recovered from Covid-19. The two experimental Covid-19 vaccines that contain mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) are especially risky – due to unknown future side-effects, the risk-to-reward is far too high for the low-risk group.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

Calgary

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: January-11-22 3:34 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca
Subject: SKILL-TESTING QUESTION FOR OUR GOVERNMENTS AND HEALTH “EXPERTS” - HOW IS THAT TOXIC COVID-19 “VACCINE” DRUG-PUSH WORKING FOR YOU?

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

CANADA SEES MORE COVID-19 CASES IN 40 DAYS OF OMICRON THAN ALL OF 2020

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

Subject: SKILL-TESTING QUESTION FOR OUR GOVERNMENTS AND HEALTH “EXPERTS” - HOW IS THAT TOXIC COVID-19 “VACCINE” DRUG-PUSH WORKING FOR YOU?

I WROTE YOU ONE YEAR AGO ON 8JANUARY2021 (BELOW) THAT THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” WERE HARMFUL AND INEFFECTIVE.

WE ALREADY KNEW FROM ALL THE TOXIC “VACCINE”-CAUSED DEATHS AND SEVERE INJURIES THAT THE COVID-19 INJECTIONS ARE EXTREMELY HARMFUL.
MORE ABOUT “HARMFUL”: “MASSIVE 145-COUNTRY STUDY SHOWS SHARP INCREASE OF TRANSMISSION AND DEATH AFTER INTRODUCTION OF COVID VACCINES”

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FURTHER PROVES THE “INEFFECTIVE” PART. “CANADA SEES MORE COVID-19 CASES IN 40 DAYS OF OMICRON THAN ALL OF 2020”

“INSANITY (OR STUPIDITY OR CORRUPTION) IS DOING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND EXPECTING A DIFFERENT RESULT.”

YOU HAVE DONE EVERYTHING WRONG SINCE THE BEGINNING OF COVID-19 – IT IS LONG PAST TIME TO START BEING COMPETENT:

- No more Covid-19 “vaccines”, “vaccine” mandates, lockdowns, etc. – repeating, they are extremely harmful and ineffective;

- Use vitamin D and C, Ivermectin plus Zinc and other effective treatments to fight Covid-19 and variants;

- Develop treatments to help the “vaccine”-injured and provide compensation for “vaccine”-caused deaths;

- If you start acting in a competent and ethical manner, Covid-19 will be over by Spring-Summer of 2022.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

Calgary

Solarina Ho, CTVNews.ca Writer Published Monday, January 10, 2022 2:55PM EST

TORONTO -- Canada documented more cases of COVID-19 during the first 40 days of the Omicron wave than it did during the entire first year of the pandemic, according to data from CTVNews.ca’s case tracker.

There have been 777,609 confirmed new infections since the first case of Omicron was detected in Canada on Nov. 29, 2021. In contrast, it took over 370 days to exceed the same number of cases after the very first domestic patient was documented back in Jan. 25, 2020.

There are also more than four times the number of active cases now than during the peak of the second and third waves in the winter and spring of last year.

And while the much more infectious Omicron variant appears to cause less severe disease than previous variants of concern, like Delta, the sheer number of infections is still driving up hospitalizations and intensive care admissions, straining already fragile health care systems in many jurisdictions. Hospitalization numbers are nearing or reaching record highs in Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick.

But the comparison is likely conservative, with actual infections during the latest wave widely believed to be significantly higher due to factors including difficulty in booking PCR tests in some regions over the holidays, and changes in testing eligibility in provinces like Ontario after the new year. Wastewater data from different parts of the country also indicate that the actual number is much higher.

“What it's really saying right now is that the number of clinical cases that we're detecting, especially because we’re only testing individuals in high-risk settings, they are only a fraction of the number of infections," Medical Officer of Health Dr. Hsiu-Li Wang for the region of Waterloo said last week.

The blistering pace of the Omicron variant’s spread has also shattered records in other countries in terms of number of new daily infections. The U.K., for example, has recorded 4.38 million infections since it detected its first case of Omicron on Nov. 27, a figure the country did not reach during the pandemic until April 13, 2021.

______________________________________________

MASSIVE 145-COUNTRY STUDY SHOWS SHARP INCREASE OF TRANSMISSION AND DEATH AFTER INTRODUCTION OF COVID VACCINES

Instead of bringing an end to this pandemic as promised, the widespread rollout of the experimental vaccines has actually caused a sharp increase in Covid-19 cases and deaths across the world, according to a recently published preprint study that looked at data from the 145 of the most vaccinated countries in the world.

The 99-page study titled “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries” found that in the US specifically, the jab has caused a whopping 38% more Covid cases per million – and an even more astonishing 31% increase in deaths per million.

In total, researchers found that almost 90% (89.84%) of the 145 countries experienced this negative effect from the vaccines after they were made available.

From the study:

“Results indicate that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.
y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].
y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation.”

Researchers performed a causal analysis comparing both pre- and post-treatment periods to come up with the difference in cases and deaths since the implementation of the vaccine by analyzing publicly available COVID-19 data to determine the effect of their widespread rollout. After eliminating all results from countries with low vaccination rates or incomplete data, there were 128 countries with sufficient data on deaths (y1) and 103 countries to examine total cases (y2), which comprised a total of 145 unique countries.

Perhaps the most telling part of the study’s results is that the countries which recorded the fewest Covid deaths in 2020 were the ones to experience the largest increases in cases and deaths once the vaccine was introduced, with some of them seeing increases as high as over a thousand percent.

“Countries with few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 appear to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration (e.g. Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, Seychelles, Cambodia, etc.).
The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million.
… we can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”

In the study’s conclusion, researchers warned that the substantial increase in deaths and cases should be “highly worrisome” for the policymakers around the world who have been promoting the experimental vaccines as the “key to gain back our freedoms.”

“The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers. They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the ‘key to gain back our freedoms. ’The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19 associated cases.

These results should encourage local policy makers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates. These results should also encourage policy makers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns.”

In short, this is just the latest evidence that we have been lied to throughout the entire manufactured pandemic.

These experimental, rushed vaccines have done nothing but make things worse and have only spurred the transmission of new variants that have prevented the world from putting this virus in the rearview mirror.

Several studies have come to similar conclusions as this one, with two recently coming out that confirmed essentially the same thing – these vaccines actually are causing more illness than they prevent.

And that’s just referring to Covid illness, it’s to say nothing of the substantial increase of other ailments and life-threatening conditions that have been sweeping the country.

Hospitals are currently ‘overwhelmed’ with patients that are ‘sicker than ever,’ and it’s not Covid.

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: January-05-22 4:55 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca
Subject: TOTAL DEATHS IN 3Q&4Q2021 ARE UP 40% VS PRE-PANDEMIC LEVELS, AND IT IS CAUSED BY THE TOXIC COVID-19 “VACCINES”

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education

IMPORTANT - PROOF THAT THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” ARE DANGEROUS - DEADLY AND INEFFECTIVE.

Jason C Schilling

President, Alberta Teachers Association
jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca

Cc: Canadian and USA media and politicians

SUBJECT: TOTAL DEATHS IN 3Q&4Q2021 ARE UP 40% VS PRE-PANDEMIC LEVELS, AND IT IS CAUSED BY THE TOXIC COVID-19 “VACCINES”

MUCH MORE HARMFUL THAN THE COVID-19 VIRUS. I TOLD YOU SO ONE YEAR AGO.

Deaths in 3Q&4Q2021 are up 40% vs pre-pandemic levels, an enormous amount, and it’s NOT due to the Covid-19 virus – it IS caused by the toxic “vaccines”.

And now the corrupt authorities are pushing these deadly “vaccines” on our children. Do NOT let them kill your kids.

I never thought it would be so difficult to stop people from harming their own children.

Regards, Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

[excerpts]

“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said.

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”

INDIANA LIFE INSURANCE CEO SAYS DEATHS ARE UP 40% AMONG PEOPLE AGES 18-64

By Margaret Menge | The Center Square Jan 1, 2022

Video:

(The Center Square) – The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people.

“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference this week. “The data is consistent across every player in that business.”

OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company that has had its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877. The company has approximately 2,400 employees and sells life insurance, including group life insurance to employers in the state.

Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers,” and that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.

“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said.

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”

Davison was one of several business leaders who spoke during the virtual news conference on Dec. 30 that was organized by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce.

Most of the claims for deaths being filed are not classified as COVID-19 deaths, Davison said.

“What the data is showing to us is that the deaths that are being reported as COVID deaths greatly understate the actual death losses among working-age people from the pandemic. It may not all be COVID on their death certificate, but deaths are up just huge, huge numbers.”

He said at the same time, the company is seeing an “uptick” in disability claims, saying at first it was short-term disability claims, and now the increase is in long-term disability claims.

“For OneAmerica, we expect the costs of this are going to be well over $100 million, and this is our smallest business. So it’s having a huge impact on that,” he said.

He said the costs will be passed on to employers purchasing group life insurance policies, who will have to pay higher premiums.

The CDC weekly death counts, which reflect the information on death certificates and so have a lag of up to eight weeks or longer, show that for the week ending Nov. 6, there were far fewer deaths from COVID-19 in Indiana compared to a year ago – 195 verses 336 – but more deaths from other causes – 1,350 versus 1,319.

These deaths were for people of all ages, however, while the information referenced by Davison was for working-age people who are employees of businesses with group life insurance policies.

At the same news conference where Davison spoke, Brian Tabor, the president of the Indiana Hospital Association, said that hospitals across the state are being flooded with patients “with many different conditions,” saying “unfortunately, the average Hoosiers’ health has declined during the pandemic.”

In a follow-up call, he said he did not have a breakdown showing why so many people in the state are being hospitalized – for what conditions or ailments. But he said the extraordinarily high death rate quoted by Davison matched what hospitals in the state are seeing.

"What it confirmed for me is it bore out what we're seeing on the front end,..." he said.

The number of hospitalizations in the state is now higher than before the COVID-19 vaccine was introduced a year ago, and in fact is higher than it’s been in the past five years, Dr. Lindsay Weaver, Indiana’s chief medical officer, said at a news conference with Gov. Eric Holcomb on Wednesday.

Just 8.9% of ICU beds are available at hospitals in the state, a low for the year, and lower than at any time during the pandemic. But the majority of ICU beds are not taken up by COVID-19 patients – just 37% are, while 54% of the ICU beds are being occupied by people with other illnesses or conditions.

The state's online dashboard shows that the moving average of daily deaths from COVID-19 is less than half of what it was a year ago. At the pandemic's peak a year ago, 125 people died on one day – on Dec. 29, 2020. In the last three months, the highest number of deaths in one day was 58, on Dec. 13.

______________________________________________

From a friend:
REINER FUELLMICH: “NEW FINDINGS… ENOUGH TO DISMANTLE THE ENTIRE (VAX) INDUSTRY!”

How bad was your batch? 2Jan2022

Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6qF2djgVdYrx/

As some of you may have received my past posts that included a Stew Peters broadcast and another of Craig Paardekoop who has broken this story wide open by showing the varying toxicity and lethality in the vaccines from all manufacturers. He also shows the distribution pattern. He was able to establish the coordinated effort between the vaccine companies and identify the lot patterns and distribution of lots that would either kill or maim based on their toxicity levels. They talk about the coordinated roll out by the vaccine companies.

Because these efforts were synchronized they show “intent” and that is what Reiner is speaking about, since “intent” has “immense legal significance”. With intent, you can get compensation for your actual damages.
Keep this and pass on to those who have been harmed and are getting ignored by their governments.

_______________________________________________________________

Note to corrupt politicians, health authorities, big-pharma drug pushers and media: LEAVE OUR KIDS ALONE!

PFIZER SAYS IT NEEDS TO STUDY A THIRD DOSE FOR TODDLERS
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola January 04, 2022

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

·    Pfizer announced their experiments on children 6 months and older were unsuccessful in 2- to 5-year-olds as they didn't produce an immune response, leading to a recommendation for a third shot and delaying the EUA for the youngest citizens
·    Although the experiments produced a strong response in children 6 months to 24 months and 5 to 12 years, the company announced they were evaluating increasing these doses as well
·    The study is listed as a phase 1, 2 and 3 model, evaluating the safety, dose and efficacy simultaneously, a strategy seldom, if ever, used. Data collection and analysis will be completed in one year on a population with little risk of the illness
·    Despite the readily available and public data, some continue to call for a shot for children for the sake of herd immunity. Yet, according to a recent engineering analysis more people have died from the shot in less time than from the disease

Children are the future. Over the centuries, many have suffered atrocities at the hands of adults. Yet the recent push to inject children with a genetic experiment may be one of the worst public health offenses perpetrated on a population of people who are unable to speak for themselves, do not have a legal voice and depend on adults to protect them.

______________________________________________

For the record - emailed to the Alberta government 8Jan2021

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE COVID-19

There is no real Covid-19 pandemic. Covid-19 was only dangerous to the very elderly and infirm, and is similar in average mortality to other seasonal flu’s of recent decades.

The Covid-19 PCR test is not fit-for-purpose and provides many false positives.

Routine testing of asymptomatic people is a waste of resources and drives erroneous policies including lockdowns.

The Covid-19 lockdowns were never effective or justified. Harm done by the lockdowns exceeds by 10 to 100 times the harm from Covid-19. End all lockdowns now and do not lockdown again.

Simple, inexpensive treatments are known to save lives – Vitamin D, Ivermectin etc. Why are these treatments not being widely recommended and implemented by Alberta authorities?

The increase in deaths of the elderly in Winter is a well-established seasonal phenomenon. “Excess Winter Deaths” in the four Winter months routinely average about 100,000 per year in the USA and about 10,000 per year in Canada, as described on our 2015 summary of Excess Winter Mortality that includes the landmark Lancet study.

...

_____________________________________________

For the record - published 6Feb2021.

THE mRNA INJECTIONS ARE EXPERIMENTAL TREATMENTS – THEY ARE HIGH RISK AND LOW REWARD.

More on Covid-19 and the mRNA injections – they are NOT “vaccines”. These mRNA injections are experimental treatments – they are high risk and low reward.

I published against taking the mRNA injections long before I saw the following videos, based on fundamental scientific principles – a relatively mild disease, except for the very elderly and infirm, with a very low risk of dying for the vast majority of people, and a high (3%++) risk of severe complications now and later from the mRNA injections.

You don’t have to believe everything in these videos to be concerned about the very real high risk / low reward of the mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) injections.

For the record, I take the flu shots every year but I will not take the mRNA injections.

Regards, Allan

SEVERE RESULTS SOON AFTER mRNA PFIZER AND MODERNA SHOTS FOR COVID-19:

Miscarriage

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/02/07/sara-beltran-ponce-wisconsin-resident-doctor-has-miscarriage-days-after-covid-vaccine/

Uncontrollable Tremors

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/02/04/kristi-simmonds-north-carolina-nurse-latest-to-suffer-uncontrollable-convulsions-after-mrna-shots/

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/14/shawn-skelton-indiana-moderna-vaccine-recipient-suffering-uncontrollable-convulsions/

Bell’s Palsy or Guillain-Barre Syndrome

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/16/israel-four-dead-13-develop-bells-palsy-after-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines/

CDC: 181 deaths

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/01/27/cdc-reporting-system-logged-181-deaths-related-to-covid-vaccines-in-three-weeks/

From: Allan MacRae [mailto:]
Sent: January-03-22 8:23 AM
To: premier@gov.ab.ca; health.minister@gov.ab.ca; education.minister@gov.ab.ca; 'CBE Office of the Chief Superintendent of Schools'; jason.schilling@ata.ab.ca
Subject: THE PFIZER INOCULATIONS FOR COVID-19 - MORE HARM THAN GOOD / DR. ROBERT MALONE / ROBERT F KENNEDY JR

Hon. Jason Kenney

Premier of Alberta

Hon. Jason Copping

Minister of Health

Hon. Adriana LaGrange

Minister of Education

Christopher Usih

Chief Superintendent of Schools

Calgary Board of Education